Talk:Gilbert Romme

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Confusing

[1] There are a few sentences in this article so confusing I can't understand them. I know almost nothing about Romme, so someone else should fix this:

Is this narration in chronological order? I suspect not. I suspect it is scattershot. It's particularly hard to tell because of the mix of Gregorian and Republican dates, some without years.

"During its mission to Normandy he went to jail." The reference of "its" is completely unclear. It's also unclear if this is saying he was jailed in Normandy, or he was jailed in Paris during someone else's mission to Normandy. And what was he jailed for?

He presented its republican calendar on September 17, 1793." Again, the reference of "its" is completely unclear. If it means "his", in what sense was the Republican calendar his? If not, in what sense did he "present" it?

"During its mission for the navy in the southwest many Montagnards were guillotined (9 and 10 Thermidor)." Similarly. The reference of "its" is completely unclear. I'm assuming that this refers to the 9 Thermidor overthrow of Robespierre and the Montagne, but it's still very unclear.

"On May 20, 1795 he supported an uprising that was crushed." What uprising? This needs a link.

"He was guillotined in Paris on 29 Prairial, an III." Should also provide Gregorian date.

Jmabel | Talk 22:23, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)

It's also incorrect it seems. According to http://prairial.free.fr/calendrier/gilbertrommeeng.html, he committed suicide in his cell before he could be guillotined. squell 22:16, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There are varying accounts, it is also claimed that he stabbed himself on the steps of the courthouse. His date of death is determined as May 20, 1795, making him one of the last, if not the last internments in the Arrancis Cemetery. I will look into this. --JHvW (talk) 13:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

I've basically rewritten the article, I think this provides much more information and addresses all your points. Of course, there's always an abundance of French sources, which is not a language I'm at all comfortable with. I have left the fact-check template, for now. squell 23:15, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Does Romme still belong the the "Guillotined persons" category? squell 23:17, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. I've recategorized more appropriately. Thanks for rewriting this. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:10, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A question remaining for me is; most sources say that Romme supported the 1 Prairial insurrection and was arrested afterwards. However, [2] states that he "abstained from openly joining the insurrection" and "demanded the liberation of the Montagnards", which would be a bit silly if he was already arrested himself. Since these are events leading up to his death, they are rather important. squell 00:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent an email to a number of pre-eminent academics asking them to the clarify Librarianofages 01:31, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles-Gilbert Romme.png Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Charles-Gilbert Romme.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 8 September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comments

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue.--Guy Macon (talk) 09:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gilbert Romme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]