User talk:Mschlindwein
Here are some links I find useful
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Village pump
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.
Cheers, Sam [Spade] 03:39, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
Removing spam links
[edit]Thanks for alerting me to the spam link in the Ramones. It is easy to remove these, once you get redirected to the spam link page, paste the listed spam link into your browser search function (usually by doing control C to copy the pasted text and then control F to get it into the search function). Then go back to the page you were editing and do a search and you will find the link and take appropriate action. It must have been there from before the date that the spam filter was activated and no one has edited the page since then. I also added the link to the Portugues article about the Ramones that you were unable to do after removing the link to 21361 . com . — © Alex756 05:57, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Henry the Navigator
[edit]An article that you've edited before (Henry the Navigator) is nominated for Biography Collaboration of the Week. If you want go there and vote. Thanks. Gameiro 20:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Featured Picture
[edit]An image you uploaded, Image:Schlossvaduz.jpg, has just become a Featured Picture. Congratulations! Raven4x4x 03:41, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
I think you misread the license terms at Image:RFederer.jpg; commercial use is clearly not permitted. I have marked the image for deletion. Thue | talk 19:18, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Thue! No, I did not misread the licence. I was indeed trying to show that the image Image:RFederer.jpg cannot be used for any purpose, as stated.", and therefore that the licence tag it had was not correct. I also think that the image must be deleted, because commercial use is clearly not permitted. Thanks, --Mschlindwein 22:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, of course :). I was confused by the fact that the copyrightedfreeuse template was still on the picture. Thue | talk 22:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
The image needs some kind of source, otherwise the claim to PD is nonsense. Googling around I would guess that this was the source : http://www.fourmilab.ch/babbage/figures/babbage.jpg - but it does not state the source. Megapixie 02:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
secure.wikimedia.org
[edit]Honestly, I have no idea why it works. I just tried editing from secure.wikimedia.org out of curiosity and discovered it worked. Perhaps it's because most ISPs do not use a proxy for secure connections whereas they might for plain HTTP connections. Just my $0.02. Flyingtoaster1337 05:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
User:DaTroll has recently challenged the copyright status of this photograph. Do you know anything about it? I hope it is either in the public domain, or the copyright holder is known (so that it will qualify for fair use). Hilbert himself died in 1943. Geometry guy 14:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I have seen that you put {{SUL Box|pt}} on your user page, I just wanted to add that the template translation exist on fr and commons. I try to find translators in the other langages... Otourly (talk) 16:56, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
As I keep telling people...
[edit]I did not come up with the "it only works in practice" thing. It's the Zeroeth Law of Wikipedia in Raul's laws, and its author is marked as "unknown." If you read the NYT article, it should be clear that I'm quoting. Sorry to bug ya about this, but I don't want undeserved recognition. Much. --Kizor 00:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- OK, sorry for that. I was not aware that the phrase wasn't yours. I'll correct the mistake. Regards, Mschlindwein (talk) 14:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Much obliged, and no worries - you did no wrong, this is just something that I prefer to be correct. --Kizor 13:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Mschlindwein. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Mschlindwein. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Atenção usuários da Wikipédia
[edit]Quero uma arbitragem nesta questão. Usuário Chronus afirma que eu o insultei. Onde e quando ocorreu isso? Apenas disse que ele está promovendo uma perseguição às minhas edições e isto É VERDADE, E QUE ISTO PARECE PESSOAL, o que eu também acredito./ O usuário apagou todas minhas mensagens dirigidas a ele. Insiste em apagar minhas edições, e afirma que estou promovendo uma guerra de edições contra ele. Solicito a arbitragem de um editor sênior para confirmar suas alegações.
Usuário:SanSilva 21h20min de 7 de fevereiro de 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanSilva (talk • contribs)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mschlindwein. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kapwani Kiwanga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Léon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)