Talk:Green Party of the United States
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Green Party of the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 120 days |
The talk page previously located at this title has been archived at Talk:Green Party of the United States/Old. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 1 June 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Green Party (United States) to Green Party of the United States. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mcampo-06 (article contribs).
Reliability of the source describing of the party as 'left-wing
[edit]Okay so, this source [1] says The Green Party, which presents itself as a left-wing alternative to both the Democrats and Republicans. It says that it presents itself as a left-wing alternative, it doesn't itself describe it as a left-wing party; this is a key distinction, as what the party says about itself is not a reliable source, especially with this, as there is accusations that the party is a Russian backed psyop to split votes from the democrats and benefit the right. In key of the presence of accusations like these, a source of the party's political position should be held to a high scrutiny of reliability.
Additionally, the phrasing is somewhat ambiguous between whether the source is saying that it presents itself as merely further to the left of the democrats and republicans, or if it's saying it presents itself as left-wing proper (as opposed to centre-left or far-left). I lean towards the former, as its comparative with regards to the democrats and republicans. Hypothetically, if a centre-left party was formed in a country with a far-right and a right-wing party, and it presented itself as such, I would describe it as presenting itself as 'a left-wing alternative to party A and party B', and believe that to be an accurate comparative description.
It is for these two reasons that I do not believe the statement in that source meets the high standard of reliability present with Wikipedia. Primarily for the first reason, with the second as an additional reason.
Would you agree, or do you have a different perspective I haven't considered? (or another source I guess) A Socialist Trans Girl 03:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- There's no reason to suspect the party is a Russian psyop. That's pretty silly. The source clearly identifies the party as left-wing, which is more or less what matters. Regardless, I've found a slew of additional sources for far-left, actually:
- North Carolina Public Radio - "But the far-left Greens could face a legal challenge from the Democratic Party."
- Relearning History: A Question-Driven Approach to the Study of the Past - "far-left Green Party]
- Washington Monthly - "far left candidates Stein of the Green Party"
- Jill Stein adds to Biden’s 2024 problems - "Stein’s abrupt relaunch into presidential politics comes weeks after Cornel West, a leading academic and progressive activist, decided to run as an independent after formerly campaigning with the Green Party. His departure created an opening for another choice on the far-left ticket, where Stein stepped in this week with little fanfare."
Toa Nidhiki05 05:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, there is reason. And no, that's wrong, it says that the party presents itself as left-wing, not that it is.
- That first one is talking about the North Carolina Green Party, not the national party.
- The third one is talking about Jill Stein, not the green party as a whole.
- Couldn't find much info about the second source book source.
- Not quite sure the implications of the 4th.
- Quite frankly, I don't think that news sources with passing refrences about it being far-left is the way to go (for this, and for other parties as well). I think we should do academic sources instead. A Socialist Trans Girl 10:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Library of Congress also calls the GPUS a left-wing party. In fact, I could not find a reliable source which describes the GPUS's political orientation as anything other than left-wing. Between self-identification and the widespread usage in the media, there is no reason to not describe the GPUS as left-wing, especially in the US political context.--User:Namiba 13:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Namiba Oki then cite that, but the current source isn't adequate. I consider the LOC reliable enough. A Socialist Trans Girl 07:53, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Library of Congress also calls the GPUS a left-wing party. In fact, I could not find a reliable source which describes the GPUS's political orientation as anything other than left-wing. Between self-identification and the widespread usage in the media, there is no reason to not describe the GPUS as left-wing, especially in the US political context.--User:Namiba 13:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Requesting redirects
[edit]Would someone be able to make redirects to this Green Party of the United States page for the co-chairs listed in the infobox? They are:
- Craig Cayetano (NJ)
- Darryl Moch (DC)
- Alfred Molison (TX)
- Tony Ndege (NC)
- Margaret Elisabeth (WA)
- Tamar Yager (VA)
- Joseph Naham (NY)
Thanks 72.8.237.42 (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's better to not do that. If you search for Darryl Moch, for example, right now you'll find him named in at least 6 other articles: Green National Committee, 2022 Council of the District of Columbia election, 2024 Council of the District of Columbia election, List of state Green Parties in the United States, D.C. Statehood Green Party and Perry Redd. Redirecting his name to just this article would limit the information readers could find out about him. Station1 (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class socialism articles
- Mid-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Mid-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- C-Class political party articles
- Mid-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles