Talk:Declaration of Indulgence (1687)

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in England may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Comment

I don't know how to do a redirect, but someone should do so - there is a somewhat more detailed article at Royal Declaration of Indulgence. Sturgeonslawyer (13 April 05 1.12 PDST)

They are not the same thing. One was issued in 1672, the other in 1688. --Valentinian 17:53, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

why is the full text not reproduced here? presumably it is in the public domain. 70.187.18.116 20:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

James II not Charles II in opening para. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.6.82 (talk) 21:41, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

The description of the Covenanters as "extremist" is biased and has no place in an encyclopedia. I propose that it be removed Acorn897 (talk) 17:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Declaration of Indulgence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040227140532/http://www.jacobite.ca/documents/16870404.htm to http://www.jacobite.ca/documents/16870404.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]