Talk:Octane

Chemicals: Core Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Making the octane page a disambiguation page

I noticed that the word octane can refer to any of the octane isomers, the octane rating, and probably more other subjects. Therefore, I propose that the octane page be made into a disambiguation page.

Actually, the disambiguation page exists. But I have to say that the section on the octane rating that is on this page does not belong.

I'm going to go bold and delete the section on the octane rating in the octane page unless someone comments on it before May 31.

Littleb2009 (talk) 19:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would object to deleting and db'ing without more discussion. I would recommend starting an RFC at Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles (or elsewhere and cross link it) to get as many interested souls involved as possible. There may be some better options that you and I haven't thought of, and a wider discussion should flesh them out. I get your point that the article could use improvement, I'm just not smart enough to instantly say what that should be. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. Littleb2009 (talk) 03:02, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I propose a split. One article for octane(the chemical) and one for octane rating. GPTHURSTON

Yes, but what does octane do? How does it prevent against engine knocking? Should I bother filling up my 2002 Camry with 91 octane or will 87 suffice? Why do television announcers talk about "high-octane racing?"

I propose that the article absolutely not be split. Octane is a thing, not a rating, though it is treated in the media as a rating. The article needs to explain (by someone qualified to do so) how, when, and where octane is "added" to gasoline, or does it just "appear" during the refining process. Or is octane not actually in the gasoline ever, but just used as some reference measure?

Higher octane number, more octane present, more energy released from combustion

(Higher octane has nothing to do with energy being released for combustion. It's all about resisting pre-ignition)

Request - please give the reaction formula for combustion.

Engine knocking is autoignition AFTER the spark

In the early days of automotive engineering, it was assumed that engine knock was due to autoignition before the spark, but research has shown that to be incorrect. It is autoignition after the spark but before complete combustion of the fuel.

See http://www.faqs.org/faqs/autos/gasoline-faq/part3/ 74.70.32.60 02:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If this is true, then it would appear that the fuel is not completely mixed - some components are igniting more readily than others. The pre-ignition theory was straight forward..

From C Ed Wright: Ignition is initiated at the spark plug gap as the spark jumps it, but autoignition occurs as the flame front traverses the compressed fuel-air mix, the burning mix expands and further compresses remaining unburned mix ahead of the flame front, causing it to ignite from the heat of compression exactly as diesel fuel ignites. This "knocking" is sometimes called "dieseling" because it is the same phenomenon but in a non-diesel engine, particularly when it causes a gasoline engine to continue to run after the ignition is shut off and no spark occurs.

Octane rating is not a media fiction, it refers to the theoretical amount of octane in a given blend that would cause resistance to autoignition to the degree that an actual blend does, even if no actual octane is in the blend. For example, if a gasoline was 100% octane, it would also have an octane rating of 100; if only 90% octane, its rating would be 90; but any mix of other components and octane rating boosters, called "anti-knock agents", that behave the same as those percentages of octane, get the same rating as actual octane percentages. And the higher the compression ratio, and to a lesser extent the further the spark advance, actually the combination of both; the higher the octane rating must be to prevent autoignition.

Octane is merely one compound of many that can be found in gasoline. It has the highest resisance to autoignition of all, and ideally, all gasoline would be pure octane, and all gas engines could then have something like 12:1 compression, for maximum power or greatest economy or a compromise of both. Unfortunately, only a tiny amount of octane per gallon is produced during "cracking" & refining gasoline, and difficult to purify as well, altogether making pure octane extremely expensive hence absolutely not feasible for general use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.125.243 (talk) 16:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aviation fuel -- so-called Av-Gas -- and certain auto racing fuels actually have octane ratings higher than 100, despite the fact that fuel cannot be more than 100% octane, or more than 100% ANYTHING. This is simply accomplished by adding even more antiknock compound(s) and the rating number extrapolated according to the resistance to autoignition.

The octane rating has absolutely nothing to do with the amount of energy in the blend or the amount of power or speed that can be had, in any given engine rated for a given octane rating. In other words, an engine designed to run on "Regular", typically 87 Octane, actually runs best on that; using "Premium" or "Super" at 93 Octane in the same engine actually loses a little power because the higher octane-rated blend actually burns slightly slower, but costs a lot more -- you DON'T get what you think you paid for. Higher octane gas is not "better" (higher quality in any sense), it just burns slower to resist autoignition in higher-compression engines. Some turbocharged or otherwise supercharged engines require higher octane fuel because the supercharging raises the effective compression ratio, depending on actual compression ratio, relief settings, etc.

"High-octane racing" on the other hand is just excited mediababble suggesting that the racing action is more fast & furious than at some other times. Virtually all auto racing involves high-compression engines, lots of spark advance, and supercharging depending on Racing Class, hence all requiring high-octane fuel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.125.243 (talk) 15:37, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The formula for both gasoline & diesel fuel combustion would be a really messy mix something like:

(v)C(x)H(2x+2) + (w)O(2) + (y)N(2) = (a)CO(2) + (b)CO + (c)C + (d)H(2)O + (e)NO + (f)NO(2) + (z)C(x)H(x+2)

But this does not include all the various additives including-but-not-limited-to detergents, antiknock agents such as MTBE, ethanol, etc., that differ from one place to another, and all their unpredictable miscellaneous post-reaction compounds.

On the other hand:

(w)Ethanol + (x)O(2) = (y)CO(2) + (z)H(2)O —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.125.243 (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Octane rating method explained in a 1951 issue of Flight here: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.53.233 (talk) 23:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Octane is not octene

Common isomer for Octane is Octene, with the same C₈H₁₈.

This is false as octene is C₈H₁₆

~AQ 20:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Octane = Alkane

Octene = Alkene

Octine = Alkine

Not important, but interesting. --Ratstail91 (talk) 02:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enantiomers of Octane?

The article for heptane lists both the number of structural isomers (9) and that same number IF different enantiomers are counted separately (11). It seems like it would be a good thing if this, the octane article, did the same thing. Obviously, this applies to higher alkanes as well. However, above heptane, I don't know the relevant numbers. If someone does, would you please add them to the article? Thanks! RobertAustin (talk) 13:38, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Don Tom (talk) 19:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have any enantiomers been separated? Have all 18 (or 19) isomers been prepared? I suggest 19 because 3,4-dimethyl-hexane has a meso, dextro, and laevo form, and the meso form should behave like a distinct compound. Scott Tillinghast, Houston TX (talk) 00:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Metaphorical use

This section is mostly nonsense.

I found a reference to “high octane thinking” in a 1946 book called Make Your Life Worth While by Emmet Fox.

In 1959 (2 October) the Baltimore Sun said: “The Chicago White Sox, reputedly long on speed but short on power, exploded a high-octane offensive against Los Angeles and crushed the jittery Dodgers.”

And in 1977 (15 April) the Boca Raton News ran a review of Seven Days in May that said: “While giving us a slick, high-octane blend of thriller and disaster movie idioms, Frankenheimer also provides a cool, objective study of terrorism.”

These are three out of dozens of figurative uses of “high octane” or “high-octane” I found to be in print between 1946 and 1989, and I only spent about ten minutes looking.

What I’m saying is, the phrase has been used and commonly understood since, at least, the mid-1940s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.171.121.248 (talk) 01:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I mentioned it to the originator of the second graph, Gregory Feeley. If he doesn't respond, I support removal of the section (or more in-depth research using LA Times or NY Times account if someone has one). AlanM1 (talk) 20:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.111.15.186 (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So what does it mean? What's the metaphorical equivalent of reducing engine knock?--46.115.3.33 (talk) 03:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enthalpy of combustion in MJ/mol

I believe that for consistency, it would be better to display the enthalpy of combustion for octane in KJ/mol, not MJ/mol. I'm adding this talk section since I'm not sure whether this is a necessary edit. Should it be done? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DonolKnoop (talk • contribs) 14:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 26 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Publicscale (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Wuhudasima, Ooogaboooga 101.

— Assignment last updated by Ooogaboooga 101 (talk) 05:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Wiki article contains the basic chemical properties of octane, but it lacks the use and production of the compound. Background information will provide more understanding about this compound. Although octane’s chemical properties and hazards are well-cited, several explanations on its effect on engines have no citations. As for visuals, the article has only structural models. Adding photographic images can illustrate the relevance of octane as a real-life compound. Publicscale (talk) 15:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]