Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joacim Ryd
Appearance
Doesn't establish notability. --fvw* 23:14, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC)
- Delete. - probably speedy after the vote. Jeff Knaggs|Talk 23:34, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, though I am not sure it qualifies for speedy. -RidG (talk) 02:43, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Verging on speedy. --LeeHunter 04:05, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Blatant vanity. Unfotunately output of the vote isn't sure (As I understand it, some do consider decisions like this "highly subjective"). --Wikimol 07:44, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Pure vanity Egil 20:36, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not a speedy, just egregious pimple puff, v. Wyss 03:08, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)