User talk:Arsene

Conceptual art

You are about to break WP:3RR, but you are edit warring anyway and that can lead to a block. Please note that 4 reversions is a maximum not an entitlement. Use the talk page to discuss differences!!! That's what it's for...!!! Tyrenius 23:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As requested above, please use the talk page. Don't just keep reverting, or you will be blocked for edit warring. Other users have posted on the talk page. Tyrenius 04:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Liviu Librescu. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rdfox 76 17:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I screwed that one up. It was someone else who contributed the vandalism. Hard to keep track of who's making what edit right now. Rdfox 76 18:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of compositions by Ludwig van Beethoven

Thought you might like to know: I submitted a Featured List Nomination for this list, of which you seem to be a major author. I did some tinkering around the edges (lead, references, section headers, etc.) first. Cheers! —Turangalila ^talk 01:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cheech and chongs next movie.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cheech and chongs next movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:GrandmasBoyPosterLarge.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GrandmasBoyPosterLarge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Cheech and chongs next movie.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cheech and chongs next movie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use 'Show Preview'

Just sending you a reminder to always use the 'Show Preview' button while making edits. You have a lot of saved mistakes in Emerson College with adjusting the image which complicates the article history. Thanks!

Non-free use disputed for Image:V8 Logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:V8 Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TenderGrill Edit

Please stop making this edit - it is factually incorrect. The source you cite does not state that there was a chopped patty used for any of Burger King's grilled chicken sandwiches. As a 20+ year employee and manager of a BK franchise, I can tell you that at no time has the grilled chicken sandwich used a chopped patty. It has always used and currently still uses a whole muscle piece of chicken breast that includes some of the rib meat. The only thing that has changed is the portion size of the patty and the seasoning used.

If you read the current ingredient list for the TenderGrill sandwich, you will find that the first ingredient reads white meat chicken with rib meat - just like the source you quoted. Every thing that is past that is the seasoning and marinade used to flavor the product.

Jeremy (Jerem43 02:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

sources for coeducational years?

Hello, just wondering if you have a source for the years you added to the "coeducation" page, where US institutions became co-ed. I'd really really like a good site which shows essentially the same info, but wiki's not a cite-able source, 'ya know... >.>

Any help would rock, thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chippy569 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:B HauntedHouse Color front.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:B HauntedHouse Color front.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kip Smithers ^T/C 23:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:51WTBW5A13L. SS400 .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:51WTBW5A13L. SS400 .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. β^_command 22:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Erotic cake

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Erotic cake, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Erotic cake is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Erotic cake, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Seuils.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Seuils.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gose-Flasche.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Gose-Flasche.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:4129HD5RKEL. SS500 .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:4129HD5RKEL. SS500 .jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Nextmovie1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nextmovie1.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kenyonshield.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kenyonshield.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Butter on a Brawny Ladd

Butter is such a minor item that its presence or absence on a burger-like sandwich is of no significance, in my opinion. Your preferred wording seems to make it highly significant since you say it is there to illustrate the range of offerings. I find that close to ludicrous but will not push this further. Presumably, someone will come along in in the future and remove the "buttered or unbuttered" as inconsequential verbiage. Pzavon (talk) 20:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Lowellcommuters2.jpg

File:Lowellcommuters2.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Lowellcommuters2.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Lowellcommuters2.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

E & J Gallo Winery

You recently edited the E & J Gallo Winery article, adding two names to the "Additional brands" section. You may have missed the beginning of that section, where it specifically says, "Please do not add any brands to this list if they're already mentioned above." Both of the brands you added were already mentioned in the article, which is why I reverted your edit. If you have any questions about this, just ask. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 19:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Martincreednothing1997 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Martincreednothing1997 2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa ^(Talk) 22:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We're recruiting art lovers!

Archives of American Art Wikimedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the Smithsonian Archives of American Art and I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about art to participate in furthering art coverage on Wikipedia. I am planning contests and projects that will allow you access, no matter where you live, to the world's largest collection of archives related to American art. Please sign up to participate here, and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 00:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for all those refs at the "Döner" article. Could you also possibly help to relocate "Shawarma" info in that article into the "Shawarma" article that already exists? Thanks in any case. Best. --E4024 (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tonkatsu may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

//kids.donga.com/news/vv.php?c=10&d=10&page=314&id=20200411306918 |title=국립국어연구원, 다듬은 말 바로쓰기운동 펼쳐 (The National Institute of the Korean Language, started a campaign to use refined (loan) words. |

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:03, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited White Mountains (New Hampshire), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Benson (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chili con carne, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Burbank and Green Bay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation

Hello, Arsene. You are invited to join WikiProject Food and drink, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of food, drink and cuisine topics. Please check out the project, and if interested feel free to join by adding your name to the member list. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Little Tokyo, Los Angeles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westside. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mount Pleasant, Iowa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Harlan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Shelves of Gain detergent.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shelves of Gain detergent.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eisenhüttenstadt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Doner kebab, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Arsene. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Arsene. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four by four/Four-wheel drive listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Four by four/Four-wheel drive. Since you had some involvement with the Four by four/Four-wheel drive redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ppp ery 23:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Arsene. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Juliet Glass for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juliet Glass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliet Glass until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doner kebab (gyros) and Taxi Driver

Hi Arsene - I thought you might be interested to know that I found a reference regarding the restaurant shown in the film Taxi Driver as serving doner kebab, for which you had added a citation in the doner kebab article. At the time I thought it was interesting but had to remove it because the film, being fictional, would need corroborating evidence. Well, it took me two years, but I finally found it! The restaurant is the Syntagma Square, which is actually a Greek restaurant. It served what we would now call gyros, rather than what we would now call (Turkish) doner kebab. I tracked down a restaurant review from 1971 in New York magazine of Syntagma Square, which says the following:

"The Syntagma Square ... is a very small restaurant ... specialties of the house are limited to a few well-prepared items. There is souvlaki, the small chunks of skewered lamb grilled over hot coals, then served on pita bread with onions, tomatoes and sauce (85 cents) ; doner kebab, also known as a gyro, the by-now-familiar compressed seasoned lamb cooked on a vertical rotisserie, slices of which are served as a sandwich on Greek pita bread with slivered onions, tomatoes, spices and sauce (85 cents)"

Beyond showing that something called doner kebab was being sold, that reference is the first proof I've been able to find that the names gyros and doner kebab were for a time used interchangeably, in this case by the same restaurant, for the same (Greek) dish. It also cements the other evidence that gyros is a Greek variation of the original Turkish doner kebab. I've added the information to both the doner kebab and gyros articles. I put the film reference in the gyros article. Thanks for the clue that put me on the track of it! --IamNotU (talk) 15:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Basement culture listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Basement culture. Since you had some involvement with the Basement culture redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arsene. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arsene. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Locals casino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arizona Charlie's. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

link ro German Wikipedia

Thank you for adding a link in Stanley Kubrick, but please never link directly to any other Wikipedia. we have {{ill}} (interlanguage link) for better accessibility. I fixed the one I saw, please do it for other instances of such links, by you or others. We help blind people, among others. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]