Talk:Finding Nemo

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Finding Nemo article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Finding Nemo has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 18, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
January 12, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Australia: Sydney Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Finding Nemo is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Disney High‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Films / Computer / Pixar High‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pixar work group (assessed as Top-importance).

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Untitled

please keep the list of characters article on the wiki its needed thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spareproud (talk • contribs) 22:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information in the cast

Coral being killed by the Barracuda would be included in the cast among other information about the characters. Is this possible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4980:90:B19D:744E:2BCC:D341 (talk) 21:23, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Protagonist Mistake

I believe there is one small mistake in the plot's current revision: Marlin should be mentioned first, because he is actually the film's main protagonist, not Nemo (although the latter's name is in the title) and he appears first as well.--Sstanford2 (talk) 18:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, the order should be how the credits list them. Usually that is based on how powerful and established the actor is, not on anything to do with the story. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 June 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In Navajo section

Grammar/spelling:

mean to means

Majority....(is should be changed to are) Al Sundby (talk) 22:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 22:23, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

2604:6000:110D:898C:C1BF:F64C:AF72:94AE (talk) 23:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Ward (additional voice) (recedited)

Couldn't find that in independent sources. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting Sydney "Harbor" to "Harbour"

The place name noted as "Sydney Harbor" should be corrected to "Sydney Harbour" given it is an Australian place name (proper noun) and not an American place name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blurbmaust (talk • contribs) 14:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done per WP:ENGVAR proper name exception to WP:ARTCON. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lawsuit

Wasn’t there a lawsuit about the film allegedly ripping off a French children’s book?

“In 2003, French author Franck Le Calvez filed suit against Pixar and its distribution company Walt Disney Pictures, claiming that the story and the characters from his book, “Pierrot the Clownfish”, were plagiarized in the film Finding Nemo. The author and his lawyer, Pascal Kamina, demanded from Disney a share of the profits from merchandising articles sold in France. Le Calvez and Kamina lost the lawsuit on March 12, 2004 and intended to file an appeal on October 5, 2004;[2] however, to date there has been no further action taken against Pixar on the matter. On April 15th 2021, The Film Theorists made a YouTube video believing that it was actually Le Calvez who had copied Disney.”

--121.221.160.101 (talk) 06:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the lawsuit about the film allegedly ripping off a French children’s book?

“In 2003, French author Franck Le Calvez filed suit against Pixar and its distribution company Walt Disney Pictures, claiming that the story and the characters from his book, “Pierrot the Clownfish”, were plagiarized in the film Finding Nemo. The author and his lawyer, Pascal Kamina, demanded from Disney a share of the profits from merchandising articles sold in France. Le Calvez and Kamina lost the lawsuit on March 12, 2004 and intended to file an appeal on October 5, 2004; however, to date there has been no further action taken against Pixar on the matter.”

--101.173.71.14 (talk) 00:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that both texts were copypasted from Pierrot the Clownfish, there and at Finding Nemo#Production. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 03:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

english

what is the setting and theme 136.158.83.176 (talk) 00:15, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Premiere

I’ve found online on this article https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/red-carpet-flashback-finding-nemo-133017734.html that finding Nemo seemed to premiere at the El Capitan Theatre on May 17, 2003. So can I edit the article to show that on the top of the page and release part of the page below please? DrkWebber (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I made a mistake, may 18th not 17th. DrkWebber (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By "top of the page" do you mean the lead? If so, we don't typically mention where a movie premiered, in terms of the specific theater, in the lead. I don't have any opposition to mentioning it in Release section though. DonIago (talk) 21:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean at the top of the page where it says "release date". DrkWebber (talk) 16:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I'm guessing you mean the infobox then. Based on Template:Infobox film, I think you could add the month without any significant concerns. DonIago (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll add it soon. DrkWebber (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

To include Finding Nemo (soundtrack) in the music section 223.178.83.187 (talk) 13:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:42, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental consequences section

I've been looking into the environmental consequences of Finding Nemo and haven't found any hard evidence that there was actually an increase in the amount of wild fish taken for aquariums after the film's release. Meanwhile, there is at least one peer-reviewed scientific article which questions the supposed environmental damage. The references supporting the idea that the film was harmful to ocean life are all very old and anecdotal, quoting organizations that are obscure and some no longer exist.

I have already added the reference to the peer-reviewed journal for balance, but I'd argue that the section needs a complete clean up to reflect that this was more likely a moral panic than anything based on reality, unless someone can find better evidence to the contrary, in which case posting that evidence as references would make the section much more credible. Newfoundlandguy (talk) 17:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]