Jump to content

Talk:Norwegian Air Shuttle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Rename this article?

[edit]

Shouldn't this article be renamed (moved) to Norwegian ? I tried to get some definitive info at their website, but I only got an "implicit impression" that they now call themselves Norwegian (no explicit info on the name change). --Wernher 23:29, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The company is listed as Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA in the Norwegian company registry (Enhetsregisteret). Also, the footer on the website says Norwegian Air Shuttle. --SAB 18:25, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Fleet size

[edit]

There are a number of inconsistencies between the fleet size figures from different sources. The official company webpage says it has 19 aircraft. If you are reading the English version. If you read the Norwegian version of their website, they have 18 aircraft. The Jetphotos census database lists them with 17 aircraft. (Jetphotos is not 100% reliable, they listed 16 until I sent them a note telling them about LN-KKW, even so, I have been unable to find the elusive aircraft number 18.) Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at it again, I think it is LN-KKT which is missing. Cannot verify its existence just yet though, but it is apparently only been in service for NAX for 3 months [1]. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article written as an advertisement

[edit]

When I read this article, I feel that it is written as an advertisement, especially when it it stated a lowcost airline with elements of a network airline, the text about their customer friendliness and competetive prices and the HUGE ammount of Norshuttle Marketing Material used in the article.

Please mark article as

(Joakim 22:14, 16 January 2011 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhz94 (talk • contribs)

Both low-cost airline and network airline are objective terms with specific criteria which an airline can or cannot meet. I cannot find any mention of "customer friendliness" or "competitive prices"; these should of course be removed at sight. If by "HUGE ammount of Norshuttle Marketing Material" you mean the use of high-quality images of the fleet, than that is just good. Nothing is better than a well-illustrated article. I am removing {{advertisement}}, as there is nothing I can see which should dictate it being there. If there are specific sentences or other things which need fixing, it is better to correct them (be WP:BOLD) than to tag an otherwise fine article. Arsenikk (talk) 13:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I have added a new section under this heading, to cover/summarise issues not shown elsewhere. This seems very suitable for the middle-sized/smaller carrier. I have modelled the table on the one at Air Berlin ( although some details are not yet complete) - hope everyone likes it. Carbonix (talk) 00:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC}

[edit]

This part is onesided and only tells one side. It does not say anything about how the disputes ended or how they have progressed. Please remove or rewrite. Mortyman (talk) 17:52, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Norwegian Air Shuttle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures on tail.

[edit]
         Til Norwegian Airline  v/ Bjørn Kjos 
         

         Håper  Bjørn Kjos får lese dette :Hvis du mangler bilde for å sette på halen til et av dine fly

         vil jeg anbefale Engebret Soot, husmannsgutt fra området kalt Mangen i Aurskog Høland kommune.

         Det viste seg at han var et geni uten utdannelse . Han bygde sluser fra sjøen Skjærvangen i Hedmark og hele           



         veien til Halden ,for tømmerfløtning og båttransport .Han utførte også andre oppgaver vedr. sluser.                         

        Ettersom min kone er i familie med Engebret Soot er jeg litt interessert i dette. 

        MVH  Leif Grorud Hareveien 7   1960 Løken  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.78.69.169 (talk) 20:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

B787

[edit]

I recently flew with Norwegian for a long-haul flight and they had Boeing 787 Dreamliners which are not listed with the fleet in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.102.178.138 (talk) 01:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They are operated by either Norwegian Long Haul or Norwegian Air UK so are not listed here. MilborneOne (talk) 15:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

787 aircraft back in the fleet table?

[edit]

I've noticed the long haul 787s back on the fleet table although the anchor in the editor still reads "Norwegian Short Haul Fleet" within the braces, and the section reads "mainline fleet" which, in case I misunderstand, wouldn't include the subsidiaries Norwegian Long Haul, Norwegian Air International, or Norwegian Air UK. That said, the previous figure of 100+ 737-800 aircraft when it had specified "Norwegian Air Shuttle aircraft" included aircraft registered to NAI, whereas the amount of in-service 737 MAX 8 aircraft were listed on NAI's article only. Meanwhile, several Norway-registered aircraft have been and are being reregistered to NAI with Irish registrations though these remained included in the parent company's figure.

Are we including Norwegian's entire fleet across all associated companies and subsidiaries (except the A320neos that have been leased out), or limiting the fleet table to that of parent Norwegian Air Shuttle only? ChainChomp2 (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Norwegian Air Shuttle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Norwegian Air Shuttle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New routes!

[edit]

Well, Norwegian air have plans to launch flights to Rio (GIG) from London Gatwick (LGW) on there 787's (Norwegian Long Haul.) I wonder why there is no headline stating that they have plans to launch flights to Rio (GIG.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:3277:F900:5C84:857E:4510:765B (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Total order of 72 Boeing 737 MAX8?

[edit]

The fleet table says that Norwegian operates 13 Boeing 737 MAX8 and has 59 on order. In sum 72. Are there referenences, which add up the orders in the past to 72? WikiPate (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Norwegian_Air_Shuttle&oldid=1204339361"