User talk:Bobber1

Welcome!

Hello, Bobber1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Hello again. . . . .

Hi there, Fernando (aka Bobber1, aka Bobber2, aka (I suspect) User:63.147.240.11). Now I know you've been given four direct opportunities to learn how to edit in Wikipedia; the links above, the links at Bobber2, the discussion page at Ed, Edd n Eddy and an email from Quickbreak. Unfortunately, while you are undoubtedly enthusiastic, the quailty of your work seems not to have improved. You are causing other editors a lot of trouble in fixing your mistakes and cleaning up after you. Please, please please read the above links so you can learn to be a better editor. If you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page.

Let me also suggest that you use the "Show preview" button when editing - that way you can double-check spelling and typos before you save your edit. It's easier on you and everybody else. You should also read the policy at Wikipedia:Fiction, so you will understand why many other editors object to some of your articles and why some of them will probably wind up being deleted.

I don't mean this as a personal attack. It would be great if you could become a useful contributor here - you know lots of stuff that I don't - but you've really got to slow down a little, and be more careful and responsible. The administrators (I'm not one, by the way) are aware of your edits and behavior. I know you have already been blocked from editing once. If you continue doing the same things you could wind up permanently banned from here. Nobody wants to see that happen. Soundguy99 09:07, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know Fernando?

"How do you know that i'm Fernando Luis Ferrer Nieves?" Bobber1

The short answer is "Because I'm smart." You are clearly the same person formerly known as Bobber2 and any editor can figure this out quickly and easily. I'm not going to tell you any more than that. If you really want to know how I know, let me strongly suggest that you spend time reading the many pages that tell you how Wikipedia works. Like all the pages mentioned in my post above. By reading those pages you will hopefully gain a better understanding of how to edit here and become less of a "problem editor."

Let me also just warn you ahead of time that if you are thinking about trying to erase stuff in order to "hide your tracks". . . . DON'T. Seriously. The GFDL software license that allows us to operate as a free encyclopedia requires the edit history to be preserved. So the information will never be lost, just hidden, and still very easy to find. Any attempt to erase it will quickly be reverted. Furthermore, erasing edit histories is basically illegal, and is viewed as a very serious offense by the sysops. Messing about with that is a very good way to get yourself banned quickly.

Again, if you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. I'll see them and be able to answer them much more quickly. Cheers. Soundguy99 17:36, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Avast Ye Eds

I'm not sure what you mean by: "This episode would be included in Edifying Ed-Ventures." Do you mean that it was included? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:32, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

House of Bloo's

Hmmmmm. . . . . . . I'm gonna assume that your edit summary ("Start and finish and added cleanup tag because the plot is not understandable") and addition of the cleanup tag is an attempt to improve your style. Which is great, and I appreciate the effort. However, writing a poor article and labeling it a poor article and asking other people to clean it up is still kind of impolite. If you can't write a clear plot summary. or if you didn't understand the plot, maybe you should just skip that part. There's still a lot of info that could be added to this article: When did the show air? What network was it on? Who starred in it? Is it a pilot for a new series? From the description it sounds like this was either an animated show or used puppets. You could mention that. Where is it set? In the U.S.? In England? In Australia? In a made-up fantasy world? Is it based on a book or a comic book? Who created it? Are they famous for creating other shows? How well did it do (what were its ratings)? You should start articles with facts like these, and then try to write about the plot. I'll be interested to see how this article develops. Soundguy99 17:38, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hitchhiker's Movie Characters

It would be appreciated if you would contribute ORIGINAL material to the character outlines of the movie characters, instead of simply reusing information from movie publicity files circulating the Internet! There is no attribution, no sign that permission has been given, and this is a violation of Copyright Laws! --JohnDBuell 21:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I warned you once about this. Copyrighted material has NO PLACE on Wikipedia without the owner's permission. If you can prove to me you have the permission of the Walt Disney Company to put the promotional material of their Touchstone Pictures division onto Wikipedia, it can return. But if it's been removed from a movie page, DO NOT put it back on that movie's talk page! --JohnDBuell 02:02, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hitchhiker names

Please do not add "hitchhiker names" of characters as you did to Lupin III. These have no encyclopedic value. - furrykef (Talk at me) 23:21, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ed, Edd n Eddy

Episode 1 links were de-wikified because they were merged into Episodes from Ed, Edd n Eddy, Season 1, and will be deleted. Making a link to them is only making the link to a temporary redirect article. Consenus decision was made to merge and delete the individual episode listings. See: Consensus. Also, if you want to enhance the episode listings, please keep them to a minimal synopsis, long descriptions will make the page to large. Thank you. <> Who 17:46, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Deconstruction

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. . Buffyg 01:17, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your creation of Nasty Patty

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --NicholasTurnbull 17:39, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Minor characters in SpongeBob SquarePants, and in general

Please don't add your speculation on what the health inspector is called. Wikipedia articles are not for your original ideas. I suggest that you check out the links in the welcome message at the top of this page if you haven't done so already as you don't seem to have grasped what Wikipedia is about. If you continue to make similar edits you may well be blocked from editing Wikipedia, and no one wants that. the wub "?/!" 20:39, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Changing episode names

Don't invent your own title for episodes of TV series. [1]

-- Curps 20:18, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also don't vandalize. [2]

-- Curps 20:37, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Button Yer Ed Translations (second nomination)

Button Yer Ed Translations is being discussed for deletion. Please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Button Yer Ed Translations (second nomination). NickelShoe 00:24, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ed (Ed, Edd n Eddy) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed (Ed, Edd n Eddy) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed (Ed, Edd n Eddy)(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk) 16:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full version of Avast Ye Eds listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Full version of Avast Ye Eds. Since you had some involvement with the Full version of Avast Ye Eds redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 08:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Rolf (fictional only)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rolf (fictional only). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 31#Rolf (fictional only) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 01:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Edifiying The Ed-Ventures" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Edifiying The Ed-Ventures and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 14#Edifiying The Ed-Ventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 23:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]