Jump to content

Talk:Tracey Ullman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Occupation of Father

[edit]

Was he a lawyer, solicitor, businessman or a salesman?

Remember "solicitor" in the UK is an attorney: in the USA it is (mainly) a salesman.

I doubt it...

[edit]

"At age 12, a headmaster saw Ullman's future potential, and recommended her to the Italia Conti Academy" I very much doubt this. The head teacher may have apporved the move, but head teachers don't spot talent, teachers do. DId the head teacher happen to walk along the corridor and spot what the music teacher and drama teacher had missed? More likelt, the head allowed something to happen.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulmarkj (talk • contribs) 00:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2002 discussions

[edit]

My secret plot to get enough material to make a Stiff records article has succeeded! "A label with punk attitude and eclectic tastes". Data below. Ortolan88

From the article:

In 1984, she had great success as a singer on the legendary punk label Stiff records, where she had six songs on the British Top 100 in less than two years, including her first hit "You Broke My Heart in 17 Places", and the international hit "They Don't Know".

This was not punk. Her songs were over-the-top evocations of 60s and 70s pop music with an 80s edge, "somewhere between Minnie Mouse and the Supremes" as England's Melody Maker put it, or "retro before retro was cool", according to a retrospective review. --Ortolan88

I'm not following the plot here. You say in your Summary line: "[meta comments moved to talk -- be bold Ortolan88 and edit-out the "punk" statement and include your own thoughts]".

I don't see anything wrong here, and certainly no cause for deletion. These aren't my opinions at all and I don't think they should be. What is there to be bold about?

It is news, if you will, that "Our Trace" recorded on Stiff, but having said that, it had to be made clear that she wasn't a punk artist as virtually every other Stiff star was.

Nonsense. Madness weren't punk (too ska), Ian Dury wasn't punk (too music hall), Elvis Costello wasn't either, though he was sometimes marketed as such. Stiff were, as their slogan at the time stated, The World's Most Flexible Record Label -- User:GWO

I never heard that slogan. All I heard were "We came. We saw. We left." and "If it ain't Stiff it ain't worth a f*ck." So, okay, Madness wan't punk. Elvis Costello was "a punk" even if his music wasn't officially '"punk". I have here before me two Stiff compilations, and great record albums ("Live Stiffs"

A record that contains a straight and sincere reading of "I Just Don't Know What To Do With Myself" by punk icon Burt Bacharach :)

and "Hits Greatest Stiffs"), and who do I see but Wreckless Eric, Larry Wallis,

Pub rockers, to a man...

Pink Fairies, Tyla Gang, Motörhead (the Larry version), The Damned, Richard Hell. How could you ever get the idea that Stiff was a punk label? So Nick Lowe is a pop star, but he wrote a song about a dog devouring the corpse of a hasbeen movie queen and Ian Dury was "music hall", but he wrote "Sex and Drugs and Rock and Roll" and "Hit Me with your Rhythm Stick"

Play either of those records to someone who didn't know Dury, and I bet you dollars to donuts the thought "Punk Rock" wouldn't cross their minds.

Play Ian Dury for someone who'd never heard him and they'd say "I never heard anything remotely like this in my whole life. Ortolan88

Also, the late, lamented Kirsty McColl was on Stiff, and she wasn't a punk either. Stiff had some punks (Damned, Hell) but they weren't close to a majority, let alone "almost all" -- User:GWO and "Our Trace" was a reincarnation of Leslie Gore crossed with John Entwistle, but their record label was awash with punks and it had a punk attitude. I suppose you'd call Lew Lewis a blues singer, but I'd call him a Stiff star. If I wrote about Madness, I'd probably feel obliged to make the same point I did about Tracey, a non-punk on a punk label. Best regards, music fans, Ortolan88

I thought I should characterize the music accurately, which I did, after listening to "They Don't Know". Not punk, but retro with attitude. That is a description, not an opinion.

Both the Melody Maker and the "retro" quote came from the semi-official "Go Home" site, but it would have been too complicated and wordy to give it a clear and correct credit so I made it anonymous. But it wasn't me.

I will listen to what you have to say before restoring this innocuous and informative material to the article. If the wording is confusing, please let me know, but gee, my heart is pure here. Ortolan88

The wording is confusing - it appeared to be an inserted comment which was trying to refute the above statement and not simply the opposing ideas of another group. Please do put the removed sentences back in. However, please do modify "This wasn't punk." to something like; "Others contend that her work can not in fact be considered to be punk, because....". Hope this helps. --maveric149

Okay, cool. rewrote it. tried to make short sentence do too much work. I think I'll delete this talk unless you think it has historical value.

Ortolan88, i changed the article because i felt that DOB should just be (December 30, 1959 -) and not include where someone was born in that part of the article. i have done this with others and no one has objected before. may i ask what your objection is? --Anon

I think it was less of an objection and more of a matter of style -- I voted for your way of doing things Anon by changing the article and I hope that Ortolan88 agrees with the change (the current format is the "standardish" way of doing things around here). --maveric149

Thank you Maveric - it is just my feeling that full birth (and death) dates (e.g. July 7, 1919 - May 20, 1996) for Jon Pertwee) is the best style for articles on people. -- Paul Melville Austin (Anon)

Change that stuff around as you like. I really don't think there's enough material available on wiki style. It's all folklore tucked away in user pages and summary lines: I just learned that movie titles are italicized, but if it is documented elsewhere than in italicized movie titles, I haven't found it. Ortolan88


Is there a guideline page on how to give birth & death dates & places? If there isn't maybe some of the discussion here could be cooked up to start one. (and placenames too... "London, England" just looks wrong) -- user:Tarquin

Tracey's first UK hit was "Breakaway" (which also became a minor hit in the US). "You Broke My Heart In 17 Places" is actually the title track to her first album and was not issued as a single. -- RMc

Guideline for Dates

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) for the guideline on birthdates.

  • For a person still living at the time the article was written, the example given is: Serena Williams (born September 26, 1981).

Please do not change the date format in this article unless you have a really good reason that trumps this clear guideline. --Vbd 14:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations/Footnotes Missing

[edit]

This article is in serious need of citations or footnotes. It is entirely unsourced. I had also previously tagged this with a "Fan Site" warning because of its informal, un-encyclopedic tone and content. I do not have the time right now to start trying to find sources for the article. I am hoping that whoever has contributed to its development in the past will go back and add appropriate citations.--Vbd 16:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One area that this article has gotten at least some of it's information is from Ullman's autobiographical stage show, "Live and Exposed". Do you know how to add a footnote, or at least somehow show how to source the content? That would at least take care of the early years section. I'll look into cleaning some of the page up as it has the necessary information, albeit it, messy, and add adequate sourcing. If you could help with finding out how to source a stage show that is on DVD, and how to basically source it in the article, it would be most helpful. Thanks!

Update: I have ten sources to add. Will be up soon. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.82.82.248 (talk) 05:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Lawsuit against The Simpsons

[edit]

It doesn't say if she won or lost the law suit. Please add it in there. 65.40.239.99 07:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article says:

A settlement was reached whereby Ullman would receive a portion of the profits made from the show, although no amount was ever publicly disclosed.

However, in the article for The Simpsons shorts, it says the judge ruled in favor of the Network, which one is correct?Vicco Lizcano (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC) (Hey! Listen!)[reply]


Gender Blur

[edit]

The inability to distinguish between comedians and comediennes is rather inarticulate. Is there a Wikimandate that requires gender blur or would it be permissible to acknowledge that she is in fact female?

(wkdugf3649.0974hd)

  • I think that her gender is apparent from the dozens of sentences in the article that refer to her by pronouns such as "she" or "her", including every sentence in the opening section. Oh, and the photograph too. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

May I comment on the recent controversy and possible edit war over the inclusion of links to outside sites, notably three sites that unofficially cover Tracey's career? I must tread lightly here because I am the owner of one of those sites. In the past, I have generally refrained from editing this page because my site was linked here. If it wasn't linked here as a main External Link, I would feel more free to contribute. Indeed, my most recent edit (when Tracey became a US citizen) was made during a time when my site wasn't linked.

Maddyfan, I appreciate what you're trying to do, but I think it's becoming counterproductive. Please stop, for I would be better able to improve the page if my site is not linked.

Now it may be that some of my future edits might be cited by a link to a page on my site (example: a discography). That probably should be discussed on the talk page beforehand. Rreini 18:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Recurring Characters

[edit]

The article would benefit from either a list or a description of some of Ms. Ullman's recurring characters appearing on The Tracey Ullman Show on Fox television. Some of them were both famed and beloved. 71.178.118.11 09:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)kenneth_bloomer[reply]

Good suggestion, although it might be better suited for the article on the show. I have created such a list (available at http://www.rreini.com/tracey/characters.htm#TTUS) that can be used as the basis for this. Rreini 15:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Citizenship

[edit]

When did Tracey EMIGRATE officially, and when did she take the oath of CITIZENSHIP??? - SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 10:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does one ever officially emigrate from his/her homeland? I do know she's been in the US much or most of the time since the mid-80's, perhaps dating to when she got married in December 1983. And in this article (http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/show_business/ullman_readies_new_showtime_series_66707.asp), she said she took the oath in December 2006 (no specific date, just the month). Rreini 18:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tone

[edit]

As Ullman had continued her professional relationship with former producer Brooks, only the studio and not Brooks was named in the suit. In fact, Brooks was allowed to videotape his testimony because in an only-in-Hollywood twist he was at that time directing Ullman in the musical I'll Do Anything, which was released as a non musical film. A settlement was reached whereby Ullman would receive a portion of the profits made from the show, although no amount was ever publicly disclosed.

because in an only-in-Hollywood twist he was at that time directing Ullman in the musical I'll Do Anything —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.93.226.166 (talk) 07:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsons cut as Profits?

[edit]

"A settlement was reached whereby Ullman would receive a portion of the profits made from the show, although no amount was ever publicly disclosed."

I really hope that's just sloppily worded, or Ullman got stiffed and likely won't see a penny. Hollywood's creative accounting generally sees that there are no profits recorded; the smart agents ensure their people get a cut of the revenue. 203.59.80.62 (talk) 21:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons Shorts article says that Ullman's suit was unsuccessful. Here is says that it was settled in her favor. Which was it? 199.73.152.100 (talk) 14:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parents

[edit]

Both parents were born in Königshütte in Upper Silesia which was part of Germany back then (yes, Poland today). The name Ullman(n) is German as was about 50 % of the population of Upper Silesia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:45:4938:51A6:9927:D92D:C273:9C34 (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ullman was born in Liverpool or in Berks?

[edit]

Those two are far apart. Calle Widmann (talk) 22:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Tracey Ullman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tracey Ullman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tracey Ullman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tracey_Ullman&oldid=1207700946"