Talk:Nesebar

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nesebar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Bulgaria C‑class High‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture C‑class High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

World Heritage Sites B‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Naming controversy

There has been some controversy over which name should be used as the title of this article. The name of the town in the Cyrilic script is definitely Несебър, but the question is how this should appear in an English language encyclopedia.

Nesebâr originally seemed to me to be the most correct way of transcribing the name (see below), but this appears to be rare in English usage. I was enventually convinced that Nessebar was the best option because this is the name used by UNESCO on their list of World Heritage Sites, which in my mind gives this spelling some official status, although for all I know UNESCO could have made an arbitrary decision on this matter.

As an indication of the popularity of various alternatives, here are the number of Google hits for some possible spellings of the name:

Nessebar: 91,500
Nesebar: 81,000
Nessebur: 6,430
Nesebur: 3,790
Nesebâr: 1,100

My original preference of Nesebâr is not common, however I remember seeing it in Bulgaria. Furthermore the â seems to be a good unambiguous way of transliterating the Bulgarian ъ which is a schwa. As for how the word is pronounced in Bulgaria, I seem to remember it as having the emphasis on the second syllable, and the last syllable hardly being pronounced at all — it was not like the English words "bar" or "burr".

The following discussion was had on my talk page and that of Deb:

Hello. Please don't take offence that I have moved your article on Nesebar to Nessebur. An article had already been started, under what was felt to be the most common English spelling of the placename. You will still be able to access it and add to it. Deb 16:38, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

No offence taken. However, I began a rewrite of the article on this town at Nesebâr because I believe that is the correct transcription from the Bulgarian Cyrilic alphabet, even if it only gets 1000 Google hits. Nessebur which you give as the most common English spelling only gets 6000 as opposed to Nessebar with 60,000, which is currently a redirect. The Bulgarian 'ъ' is a schwa which corresponds roughly to the 'a' in English 'about' or 'o' in 'harmony', and is usually transcribed as 'â'. Nesebâr isn't the most common spelling encountered in English language tourist literature because the authors of such material are just looking for a simple phonetic representation, which either an 'a' or a 'u', along with a double 's' do well. If we are striving for encyclopedic accuracy though we should have Nesebâr as the main article with common spellings as redirects. This is also the spelling I encountered most on signs and bus timetables in the area itself. — Trilobite 16:58, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I understand your position. If you feel it has to be under the "most correct" spelling (although it's debatable whether any spelling that involves accents can ever be appropriate in the English language), then please feel free to move it. However, we must have only one article, and no double-redirects. Deb 17:03, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

At that time, a stub existed at Nessebur with Nessebar and Nesebâr as redirects. I have since discovered an unrelated stub at Nesebur. Now I have written a more extensive article I have chosen Nessebar as the location, with the others as redirects.

I have provided this information to explain why the article can be found where it is. If you disagree with my conclusions please raise them here before moving the article. It would help to have some input from someone who actually knows a lot about these matters.

— Trilobite 01:47, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

There are several ways to transliterate the Bulgarian Cyrillic alphabet. See Transliteration of Bulgarian into English. According to the official Bulgarian transliteration (used by the ministry of interior for personal names) it should be Nesebar. Markussep 21:06, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Neolithic and Thracians

Anything prior to 1000 BC belongs to Neolithic cultures.Thracians are identified at 1000 BC

John Boardman, I.E.S. Edwards, E. Sollberger, and N.G.L. Hammond. The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 3, Part 1: The Prehistory of the Balkans, the Middle East and the Aegean World, Tenth to Eighth Centuries BC. Cambridge University Press, 1982, p. 53. "Yet we cannot identify the Thracians at that remote period, because we do not know for certain whether the Thracian and Illyrian tribes had separated by then. It is safer to speak of Proto-Thracians from whom there developed in the Iron Age..."
Check Neolithic article and related articles to see which culture corresponds to any 2,000 BC or 3,000 BC for example discovery.Megistias (talk) 10:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nesebar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://naim.bg/issuesFiles/_HEROS_HEPHAISTOS.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.morskivestnik.com/mor_kolekcii/izsledwaniq/u_14.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070222105747/http://www.villabeneia.com/Site/okolnostite.htm to http://www.villabeneia.com/Site/okolnostite.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]