Talk:Lune Millennium Bridge

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

replaced link to millenium bridge by direct links to the other two - should never link to disambig page unless absolutely no alternative. also removed 'wobbling' link as incorrect target at the moment (only leads to london bridge) --VampWillow 09:28, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

OK. Only problem I can see is that there were lots of millennium bridges built, so this could turn into a long list of direct links. Lupin 09:36, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

There are only the three mentioned on WP at the moment so direct links are the right solution, but if you know of more lets get to it and add the lot! If there are enough it would be deserving of an article on the 'concept' of commemorative bridges, but one really shouldn't link to a disambig page (which is why it has the "{{disambig}}" text on it!) --VampWillow 10:46, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Yes, there appear to be plenty of the things (sorry for the 10 month delay in replying...) see http://www.lunemillenniumbridge.info/Other_bridges.html Lupin 02:53, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lune Millennium Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070621191419/http://www.whitbybird.com/projects/level2/millenniumBridgeLancaster.asp to http://www.whitbybird.com/projects/level2/millenniumBridgeLancaster.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]