Talk:Prosecution's
from VfD:
The use of 's as a suffix to prosecution is nonsensical.
rturus rturus 23:11, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- No, it isn't. For example: The prosecution's case is compelling. However, it is completely inappropriate as an article title, which ought to be prosecution (which currently redirects to criminal law). Anyhow,
delete this as a dicdef.transwiki this to Wiktionary as it is a dicdef. [[User:Livajo|力伟|☺]] 03:11, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC) - Delete: The use of the apostrophe s for a plural suffix is nonsensical. I'm going to make a wild bet that Wiktionary already has a definition for "prosecution" and doesn't need the transwiki, so just delete. ("Warning: Prosecutors Will Be Violated!") Geogre 03:44, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I made the same guess but decided to go look, and Wiktionary actually does not have a definition for prosecution, which is why I changed my vote. [[User:Livajo|力伟|☺]] 04:47, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Really? Wow. I am very surprised. BTW, I think User:R. fiend is right: this could/should redirect to Prosecution. Geogre 14:17, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Any reason this can't be a simple redirect to Prosecution? -R. fiend 07:50, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I think the text of the page would be extremely suitable as part of a Wiktionary entry for "prosecution". rturus 14:55, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
Start a discussion about improving the Prosecution's page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Prosecution's" page.
