Talk:Classic book
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Classic book article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Classic book appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 June 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Recent deletion of Sainte-Beuve photograph
[edit]Recently the photo of Sainte-Beuve was deleted with the edit summary "causes formatting issues". I've reverted that deletion, let's all discuss if the photograph should stay or go, if the size needs to be changed, what the "formatting issues" are (depending on the viewer's editing program - wikitext version...classic or 2022?/visual editor/monoskin or whatever/etc. - what one editor/reader sees when they view Wikipedia is not necessarily what a different reader sees). So, let's discuss. Shearonink (talk) 13:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Arts
- B-Class vital articles in Arts
- B-Class history articles
- Low-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- B-Class novel articles
- High-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- B-Class Literature articles
- Top-importance Literature articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles