Talk:Fixed-odds betting

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.free-bets-guide.com/articles/Different%20Odds%20Display%20Styles.html. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2005102210002802.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Fixed-odds

Why is "Fixed-odds" hyphenated? What is the source of this material or is it the writer's general knowledge? Paul Beardsell 23:13, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Left out the references

It seems someone has merged the 3 articles that used to be Decimal odds, Moneyline odds and Fractional odds but left out the references, I'm adding the reference back in. --195.157.84.178 13:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Planned rename

This article appears to be more about betting issues then gambling ones. So unless there are serious objections, I'll rename the article to Fixed-odds betting. Vegaswikian 02:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify Moneyline Odds

It's not clear on this page under Moneyline Odds what is meant by the term "better than even" and "worse than even." Can someone please clarify that here and possibly elsewhere on linked pages? I would assume "better than even" means that you will likely win, but the payout will be less than one-for-one (i.e., receive $2 for every $1 bet - the $1 amount of your original bet plus a $1 payout). And "worse than even" odds means that you will likely lose, but payout if you win will be greater than one-for-one. For beginners, gambling and odds-making has difficult nuances and semantics. Edcarrochio 20:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Other way around. But could someone explain this:[reply]

If the figure quoted is positive, the odds are quoting how much money will be won on a $100 wager (this is done if the odds are better than even). Even odds are quoted as $100 . Fractional odds of 4/1 would be quoted as $400, while fractional odds of 1/4 could not be quoted as a positive figure.

Why can it not be quoted as a positive figure? $25 is a positive figure. 121.72.68.56 12:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit/Essay

I've removed the Copyedit tag and replaced it with an Essay tag. It seems to me that the article doesn't just need rewriting for clarity, but rather the article as a whole seems like one person's advice and experience. In particular there are statements that read to my mind like POV, such as a reference to "the fallacy of loss-aversion" (surely it's not necessarily a fallacy to be averse to losing your money?). It may be that these statements aren't POV (the loss-aversion fallacy may be a known concept in gaming theory for all I know), in which case they're simply badly enough written to sound like it. The Guild of Copy Editors will be glad to return and give the article a polish, but at this stage it probably needs a ground-up rewrite with citations, wikification and NPOV. Brickie (talk) 13:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Best of It' Local jargon?

There is no citation for the "best of it" / "worst of it" jargon that takes up a disproportionate amount of space in this article. I have never heard of this and neither have my friends, though, granted, we are more engineers/mathematicians than gamblers. Is this actually a common phrase in gambling? Or, as I suspect, is it some phrase of some locality that should be at best clarified and, perhaps more sensibly, removed entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.12.110 (talk) 08:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving material to Odds or merging

It appears that the main reason for the existence of this article is to distinguish between betting at fixed odds and parimutuel betting. However, most of the material in the article would seem to be better placed in the article odds. Does anyone have any thoughts on either a.) revising the article so it is just about the distinction between fixed odds and parimutuel, with links to the main odds article for more information, or b.) merging this article completely into bookmaker and odds? Peaky76 (talk) 18:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fixed-odds betting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Odds

Manchester united ft Barcelona Mwatamba (talk) 13:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]