Category talk:Planetary images
 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
CFD Discussion - 2005
[edit]- Category was listed for renaming on February 6, 2005. No clear consensus.
I probably should be bold and redo it, but we have a bot right? Move images in Planetary images to Solar planet images, or Category:Solar system planetary images, because we will shortly be having extra-solar planetary images, and parent that cat under Planetary images. 132.205.15.43 06:12, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I would allege that you meant Category:Solar planet images. RedWolf 06:31, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
- I'm unconvinced this move is needed. Category:Planetary images should, ideally, have ten subcategories, one for each of the nine planets of our solar system, and one for extrasolar planets. Maybe eleven or twelve if you want asteroids and Kuiper Belt objects to be subcategories. The currently listed category would therefore be a parent category to categories for images from both our system and other systems. Grutness|hello?
08:11, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Depends how many images we have. Don't bother creating a category for each planet if it only has a few. Most of those images should probably be moved over to the Commons anyways. —Mike 08:19, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
CSD discussion - 2009
[edit]Even if this is empty at the time of nomination, lots of planetary images exist for proper use on WikiPedia, that do not qualify for Commons. Anything from ESA, for instance, like Mars Express images. 76.66.196.139 (talk) 05:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)