Talk:54-46 That's My Number

Reggae Mid‑importance

	This article is part of the Reggae WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the coverage of articles relating to ska and reggae. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.ReggaeWikipedia:WikiProject ReggaeTemplate:WikiProject ReggaeReggae articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Untitled

Talk moved from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion

A song, apparently, not notable. sjorford 18:18, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Keep. While the article is poor at present, the song could probably rank among the 10 defining works of the Reggae genre. It was recorded by Toots & the Maytals and is still in print. We mention the song in 1967 in music. It seems like I've stumbled across the article before, but it must be deja vu as it appears to be new. UninvitedCompany 18:21, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
The subject may be noteworthy~~, but the current article isn't worth keeping around until a real one is written. Delete unless rewritten~~. -- Cyrius|&#9998 18:38, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
- I just did. By the way, the song title gives me 705 hits on Google. UninvitedCompany
  - I'm going to take your word that it's noteworthy because I'm unfamiliar with the genre. Now a good little article. Keep. -- Cyrius|&#9998 19:04, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
Keep now, the new article is fine. sjorford 20:22, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I concur. It looks completely reasonable. DS 03:27, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)

consensus to keep

Its also referenced in the Clash song "Jail Guitar Doors"

54/46 was my number / Jail guitar doors / Right now someone else has that number Is this worth mentioning? Lizz612 04:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not unless it has an impact on something, or is otherwise a verifiably notable fact. Tuf-Kat 11:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1968 original and all subsequent versions reggae, not "ska." --Pete Scholtes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.182.157 (talk) 19:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mentions that the song is used for the bass line of Dub Be Good To Me which doesn't seem right to me, that's Guns of Brixton pretty much note for note. Could possibly do with checking by someone knowledgeable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.207.152 (talk) 11:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(2020) incorrect song name, definitely NOT 54-46

Listen the original song. The individually pronounced numbers are (fifty)-four-five-six.

A lie still remains a lie even if repeated one million times.

The first number heard in the song is cut (by the song mixer?) to 4-5-6 aka four-five-six. The second number heard in the song is barely audible as a (50)-4-5-6 aka 54-5-6 (fifty)-four-five-six.

54-46 Seems to be a typical phone or sinsemilla misunderstanding.--87.180.12.208 (talk) 06:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]