User talk:THE KING

Are you in chockos?

Reply here please: Yes I am. THE KING 12:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ASX 200 Companies

I answered on my talk page. Thanks. --Scott Davis ^Talk 10:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:S&P/ASX 200#xxx_Limited_or_not. --Scott Davis ^Talk 13:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Social Dynamics (2nd nomination)

You should know that the admin who originally closed the AfD as delete, then undeleted the article because he'd seen new evidence that convinced him, has just moved the latter part of the re-opened discussion (removing your contribution in the process). He didn't have the courtesy to tell you, so I thought that I would. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For your comments on my talk page. You're right. Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 21:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, THE KING! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

I fixed the approval bug from last night. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 15:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:QBE Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:QBE Logo.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

edit to list of autological words

could you explane to me why you made verbify into and an external link on list of autological words?· Lygophile has spoken 01:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conservapedia

Hey there.. I just had to go to Conservapedia to look at the John Howard article. It was the funniest thing I've seen for ages. Alas someone has deleted all those fascinating bits of information that the God fearing folk in the US had taken as gospel. The things people do. (If you look hard enough you can see me smiling at this point). Ozdaren 16:52, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slovio AfD, take 2

Hi there,

You may want to know, that i re-nominated Slovio for deletion. --Amir E. Aharoni 13:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Tim costello.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tim costello.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:15, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aust-army-stubby-holder.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aust-army-stubby-holder.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:11, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MonUR_Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MonUR_Logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:11, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AWE.gif

I have tagged Image:AWE.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Onesteel.gif

I have tagged Image:Onesteel.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Worleyparsons.gif

I have tagged Image:Worleyparsons.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Souljahz.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Souljahz.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Campbell_Bros_Logo.gif

I have tagged Image:Campbell_Bros_Logo.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AWE.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:AWE.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Newcrest mining.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Newcrest mining.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Passion Pop

The article Passion Pop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this product has any notability. The article has been around for years yet can only manage one very dubious ref which fails to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Passion Pop

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Passion Pop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lavalizard101 (talk) 00:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]