Talk:A9.com

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Maps Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove `\|autoi=yes`.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

"A9 recently went out of beta, with a new color scheme." -- Maybe terms like "recently' should be avoided since whatever that is recent won't be for long. Is April 14 the day out of beta or the day when the beta debuted?

A9.com and Wikipedia

A9.com offers "Wikipedia" as one of the search reference databases. But in truth, this is Ask.com's cache on Wikipedia data. The checkbox labled "Wikipedia" is a misnomer... A9.com is misrepresenting us.

A9.com and Google

Is A9's decision to drop Google worthy of a mention in the article? I think it might be, but I'm not sure enough about that to go ahead and do it. Heh.

"Breaking News"

Just changing the way this is worded - after all, it's an encyclopedia, how can it be 'breaking news' for a long period of time?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A9.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120427153704/http://sciencereengineered.com:80/2012/04/14/on-the-shoulders-of-giants/ to http://sciencereengineered.com/2012/04/14/on-the-shoulders-of-giants/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]