Talk:Veterans Stadium

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Baseball: Phillies Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Philadelphia Phillies (assessed as High-importance).

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia High‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from 700 Level (Veterans Stadium) was copied or moved into Veterans Stadium with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Jail in VS?

According to Jimmy Kimmel (reliable source, I know) the Vet had a jail and a court within its confines. Any truth to this?

This is true (I can't link to a source as my source is local radio stations). I think it was only open for the football games. anthony (see warning) 14:41, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I wouldn't call it a jail or court per say. There was a counter where uniformed Philly cops would take you to appear in front of Judge Seamus McCaffrey. The officers would then tell the judge what happened and the judge would make his deterimination on how to proceed, ie kick the guy out, arrest him, ect. They would also try to determine if the person was a season ticket holder or not. Please don't ask how I know all this. Thanks! --Tom 13:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually There WAS TWO holding cells in The Vet, and There is now 4 in The Linc. I know this because one of my past teachers son was the judge who delt withe the situation, and he was asigned there by philly govt and only placed there during game days and then was office or other work —Preceding unsigned comment added by Novanut35 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Homefield Advantage (?)

The writeup mentions the homefield advantage that the hostile environment of Veterans Stadium gave the Phillies and Eagles, but I think it should be pointed out that during the lifespan of The Vet (especially after the early 1980s), neither team was particularly good, and in particular, the Eagles lost the 2003 NFC Championship game at The Vet.

Yes, and although the Phillies won their only World's Championship (1980) at that site, in their 123 years of existence, they also lost the Series there 3 years later when Eddie Murray hit a rocket that bounced off his own name on the scoreboard. I'm thinking the only Eagles championship(s) came at Franklin Field. Wahkeenah 23:18, 30 August 2005 (UTC) The Eaglets also won at Shibe Park in 1948, in the woebegone Cardinals' last appearance in a championship game to date, a match that was played in a blizzard and was obviously for the birds. Wahkeenah 23:22, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• That's a pretty broad generalization. Actually, the Phillies ended with a wnning percentage overall at Veterans Stadium. It's a remarkable statistic, considering how poor the team's overall records were during much of the Vet's history. The Vet did prove to be a homefield advantage for a struggling franchise. You also mentioned that the Eagles lost the 2002 NFC title game at the Vet (I removed it). The game was played in St. Louis. (69.139.128.50 02:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

HELP!

I need someone to help me put the distances on the infobox! NoseNuggets 6:59 PM US EDT Sept 20 2005.

Concerts at Veteren's Stadium

External Links

I removed the dates from previous and next stadiums from the sequence boxes. I believe those are redundant since when you navigate to the those pages the dates served are already there. Randall311 20:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Great page. Trying to find a link to a history of rock concerts at the Vet. Specifically looking for concerts during 1982-1983-1984. Any thoughts?

Playing surface

The article reads that the original astroturf was repalced with Nexturf in 2001, but in the 30 years before that, the Vet used several different generations of astroturf. I've discovered that it was replaced in 1977[1] and in 1995 [2]. There was also a lot of demand to install a grass field and rumors that the stadium's drainage system wouldn't support grass. The selection of Nexturf brought controversy as it was an unknown surface and Fieldturf looked like the obvious choice.Mustang6172 (talk) 08:17, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merge from 700 Level (Veterans Stadium) to Veterans Stadium

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Without objection, content was merged. Cnilep (talk) 15:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can see no reason for a section of the stadium to have an separate article. There is no indication that the 700 Level is independently notable. Cnilep (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It may be good for a separate chapter, but I agree. ----DanTD (talk) 22:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Vicious fans?

The 700 level home to some of the most vicious fans on the East Coast? Please, what a tired, played out stereotype. Without any citations it's most definitely NPOV so I'm removing it. Yeah, nasty things happened there, but they happen everywhere, and unless there's specific proof that it happened there and ONLY there it's baseless to call them the most vicious fans on the entire East Coast. 70.91.35.27 (talk) 19:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)T[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Veterans Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/20081215_Ronnie_Polaneczky__This_is_Philly__After_40_years__we_ll_still_boo_a_bad_Santa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Veterans Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cavernous stadium and fair/foul seating

"Approximately 70% of the seats were in foul territory, adding to the stadium's cavernous feel." This is a misleading statement. It makes it sound like the seats in foul territory added to the Vet's cavernous feel. Nothing could be further from the truth. Almost every MLB stadium built starting with Camden Yards deliberately put far fewer seats in the outfield as part of creating a more intimate feel.

Assuming the 70/30 foul/fair seating breakdown of seats in the Vet is correct, I have some ideas on how to reword the first part of the sentence:

"Approximately 30% of the seats were in fair territory,"
"Approximately 30% of the seats were in the outfield,"
"Nearly a third of the seats were in fair territory,"
"Nearly a third of the seats were in the outfield,"
"Only 70% of the seats were in foul territory,"

I would prefer #4. Forklift17 (talk) 23:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]