Talk:Lists of corporate assets

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Discussion

I welcome anyone to utilized the sources included in this article to start making new articles in reference to this page. Kingturtle 22:13 Apr 16, 2003 (UTC)

You're listing this by owners rather than by owned things. In a list of owned things, one could locate Wikipedia and find out who owns it (Jimmy Wales, I presume). Michael Hardy 22:16 Apr 16, 2003 (UTC)

The idea of the lists are to start from the top and work downward. If it is discovered that Vivanti owns Scramble, and Scramble owns Socks, and Socks owns Jimmy Wales, then we're on to something. Kingturtle 23:44 Apr 16, 2003 (UTC)

Wal-Mart is not a food company, they are a retail company. Perhaps a "general" section or some kind of "Misc" section for companies that don't have other peers listed (yet) in their respective industries? joe 06:22, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Should we add Google, now that they own 5% of AOL? Or is total ownership required for inclusion here? NYT on Google-AOL sale: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/technology/16cnd-aol.html Nick Douglas 22:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Last part of the Article

I think the last part of the article should include some explanation, because, if you don't know what GFDL or MediaWiki are, you may tend to think these are companies too!

--Camahuetos 05:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tags for citation

How do you provide a list that only contains links and no information? There nothing to confirm or refute. Take them down! --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 06:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lists of corporate assets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030402180159/http://adbusters.org/campaigns/mediacarta/toolbox/who_owns/ to http://www.adbusters.org/campaigns/mediacarta/toolbox/who_owns/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]