Jump to content

Systematic theology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Systematic divinity)
"Systematic Theology" redirects here. For the book by Wayne Grudem, see Systematic Theology (book).

Systematic theology, or systematics, is a discipline of Christian theology that formulates an orderly, rational, and coherent account of the doctrines of the Christian faith. It addresses issues such as what the Bible teaches about certain topics or what is true about God and his universe.[1] It also builds on biblical disciplines, church history, as well as biblical and historical theology.[2] Systematic theology shares its systematic tasks with other disciplines such as constructive theology, dogmatics, ethics, apologetics, and philosophy of religion.[3]

Method

[edit]

With a methodological tradition that differs somewhat from biblical theology, systematic theology draws on the core sacred texts of Christianity, while simultaneously investigating the development of Christian doctrine over the course of history, particularly through philosophy, ethics, social sciences, and natural sciences. Using biblical texts, it attempts to compare and relate all of scripture which led to the creation of a systematized statement on what the whole Bible says about particular issues.

Within Christianity, different traditions (both intellectual and ecclesial) approach systematic theology in different ways impacting a) the method employed to develop the system, b) the understanding of theology's task, c) the doctrines included in the system, and d) the order those doctrines appear. Even with such diversity, it is generally the case that works that one can describe as systematic theologies begin with revelation and conclude with eschatology.

Since it is focused on truth, systematic theology is also framed to interact with and address the contemporary world. Many authors have explored this area, including Charles Gore, John Walvoord, Lindsay Dewar, and Charles Moule. The framework developed by these theologians reviews the postbiblical history of a doctrine, following a treatment of the biblical materials.[clarify][4] This process concludes with applications to contemporary issues.

In a seminal article, "Principles of Systematic Theology," Anglican theologian John Webster describes systematic theology as proceeding along a series of principles, which he draws from various theologians including Thomas Aquinas:

  • The Trinity: The Ontological Principle (principium essendi)
  • Scripture: The External/Objective Cognitive Principle (principium cognoscendi externum)
  • The Redeemed Intelligence of the Saints: The Internal/Subjective Cognitive Principle (principium cognoscendi internum)[5]

Webster has also considered the task of all systematic theology as articulating the Creator/creature distinction, known also as the Categorical Distinction or the Absolute Qualitative Distinction, a concept also explored from the perspective of compatiblistic metaphysics by Kathryn Tanner in God and Creation in Christian Theology (1988).[6][7]

Categories

[edit]

Since it is a systemic approach, systematic theology organizes truth under different headings[1] and there are certain basic areas (or categories), although the exact list may vary slightly. These are:[8]

History

[edit]

The establishment and integration of varied Christian ideas and Christianity-related notions, including diverse topics and themes of the Bible, in a single, coherent and well-ordered presentation is a relatively late development.[9] The first known church father who referred to the notion of devising a comprehensive understanding of the principles of Christianity was Clement of Alexandria in the 3rd century, who stated thus: "Faith is then, so to speak, a comprehensive knowledge of the essentials."[10] Clement himself, along with his follower Origen, attempted to create some systematic theology in their numerous surviving writings. The first systematic theology in Latin was Lactantius's Divine Institutes, and the term Intitutio would set a precedence for works of systematic theology in the western tradition.[11] In Eastern Orthodoxy, an early example is provided by John of Damascus's 8th-century Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, in which he attempts to set in order and demonstrate the coherence of the theology of the classic texts of the Eastern theological tradition.

In the West, Peter Lombard's 12th-century Sentences, wherein he thematically collected a great series of quotations of the Church Fathers, became the basis of a medieval scholastic tradition of thematic commentary and explanation. Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologiae best exemplifies this scholastic tradition. The Lutheran scholastic tradition of a thematic, ordered exposition of Christian theology emerged in the 16th century with Philipp Melanchthon's Loci Communes, and was countered by a Calvinist scholasticism, which is exemplified by John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion.

The 17th century saw a boom in focused systematic theologies within a renaissance of the scholastic method. Francis Turretin's Institutes of Elenctic Theology (1696) and Petrus van Mastricht's Theoretical-Practical Theology (1680) became touchstone works in the field, profoundly influencing later theologians like William Cunningham, Jonathan Edwards, Charles Hodge, and Herman Bavinck. Similarly, William Ames's systematic treatise, The Marrow of Theology (1629), would become the standard textbook for Harvard and Yale in their nascent years.[12]

In the 19th century, primarily in Protestant groups, varieties of systematic theology arose that attempted to demonstrate that Christian doctrine formed a more coherent system premised on one or more fundamental axioms, often reasoned out as a form of dogmatic theology. Such theologies often involved a more drastic pruning and reinterpretation of traditional belief in order to cohere with the axiom or axioms, and continental theology divided between various schools of dogmatic theology, e.g. Erlangen Theology ( e.g. F.C.K. Hoffman, Thomasius, and Gisle Johnson), Mediating Theology (e.g. Isaak Dorner), classical confessionalism (e.g. Hans Lassen Martensen and Herman Bavinck), and liberal theology (e.g. Friedrich Schleiermacher and Albrecht Ritschle). In the United States, Charles Hodge's Systematic Theology became a popular text in conjunction with his work at Princeton Theological Seminary. Significant for this period, Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher's Der christliche Glaube nach den Grundsätzen der evangelischen Kirche (The Christian Faith According to the Principles of the Protestant Church [1821-1822]) espoused the fundamental idea of a universal presence among humanity, sometimes more hidden, sometimes more explicit, of a feeling or awareness of 'absolute dependence,' and this became a focal point of either acceptation, integration, or rejection among theologians.[13] As such, systematic theology in the 19th century became a sophisticated endeavor of developing and articulating theology from certain assumed first principles, often on the back of the philosophical conversations inherited from Hegel, Kant, and Schleiermacher.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Carson, D. A. (2018). NIV, Biblical Theology Study Bible, eBook: Follow God's Redemptive Plan as It Unfolds throughout Scripture. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan. ISBN 9780310450436.
  2. ^ Garrett, James Leo (2014). Systematic Theology, Volume 1, Fourth Edition. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 20. ISBN 9781498206594.
  3. ^ Berkhof, Louis (1996-09-24). Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8028-3820-9.
  4. ^ Garrett, James Leo (2014). Systematic Theology, Volume 2. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 138. ISBN 9781498206600.
  5. ^ Webster, John. "Principles of Systematic Theology". International Journal of Systematic Theology. 11 (1): 56–71.
  6. ^ Tanner, Kathryn (1988). God and Creation in Christian Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
  7. ^ Webster, John (1982). Distinguishing Between God and Man: Aspects of the Theology of Eberhard Jüngel (doctoral dissertation). Cambridge University Press.
  8. ^ "Categories of Theology". www.gcfweb.org. Archived from the original on 1 April 2015. Retrieved 18 September 2014.
  9. ^ Sheldrake, Philip (2016). Christian Spirituality and Social Transformation. Oxford Research Encyclopedias.
  10. ^ Clement of Alexandria, Stromata, book 7, ch. 10
  11. ^ Lactantius (2008). The Divine Institutes. Translated by McDonald, Mary Francis. The Catholic University of America Press. ISBN 978-0813215679.
  12. ^ Marsden, George (1996). The Soul of the American University: From Protestant Establishment to Established Nonbelief. Oxford University Press. pp. 39–44.
  13. ^ Brock, Cory (2020). Orthodox yet Modern: Herman Bavinck's Use of Friedrich Schleiermacher. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.

Resources

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Systematic_theology&oldid=1253209010"