Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mark Latham/archive1
Appearance
Came across this while trying to find out about the Australian election and its just utterly sound. I'm keen on biography on wiki and this is an exemplar of a very nicely written piece. I've no idea who's written it but I feel featuring it would be very topical and a reward for tight, entertaining prose and also bring to the attention of people outside Australia a man who, firstly, could be the next Oz PM and secondly seems something like an alien compared to the sort of rather dry politicians we have here in Britian. With the exception of John Prescott of course who is similiarly punchy. --Mr impossible 14:42, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Object. No references (Wikipedia:Cite sources) and no lead section (Wikipedia:Lead section).Johnleemk | Talk 16:17, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)Object - same reasons as John.--mav 21:35, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)- I've removed my objection since there is now a lead section and inline references. --mav 04:31, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Support. I've expanded the lead section, but it isn't exactly my forte, so it could probably do with some improving. Ambi 00:20, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Of clear current relevance. Lacrimosus 00:27, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Support - though I'd like to see
the lead section compacted anda metion of Latham's political cue regarding superannuation. Many regard this is as the event that gave him credibility. --d 03:54, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC) Object. For an article this size, the lead section should be only half as long.--Jiang 05:57, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)- Absolutely object. This is nowhere near as complete as it should be. Where the heck is commentary of the five books he's written? What about his relationship to Gough Whitlam (get the latest Quarterly Essay if your an Aussie)? Where is the information on his leadership of Liverpool Council?
Where is the information on his colourful language?(oops, that's there) I could go on and on... though I might just start adding to this. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:41, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)