User talk:Karam.Anthony.K

Anyone is welcome to talk to me here. Please respond in the correct year and sign with --~~~~, thanks! --Karam.Anthony.K 04:20, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2005

Lyrics sites

This used to be the site of discussion regarding the legality of lyrics sites. I have since realized that quoting song lyrics for education/research purposes is legal if...

The lyrics are hosted in the United States. (It may be legal in other countries too - I just haven't looked into it)
Those who host it make no profit off the lyrics and since it is impossible to monitor hosting costs and profit, it would only be reasonable for the host to do the service at monitary loss.
Disclaimers are posted wherever lyrics appear and legal terms of service are publicly visible.

I'm building a new lyrics site and these are the terms I will be adhering to. If anyone thinks there is a flaw, please tell me here so I can correct my mistake before it's too late. --Anthony5429 04:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The new site is open and can be found at http://e-lyrics.org. The legal information about E-Lyrics is available at http://e-lyrics.org/legal.php. --Anthony5429 23:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2006

Babel

See wikipedia:Babel. Cheers! --Fred-Chess 01:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Anthony5429 05:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming/moving articles

Why can't you just do it yourself? --Kurt Weber 21:42, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony5429, See my reply on the relevant talk page. --Iustinus 23:15, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:DDR3 SDRAM.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DDR3 SDRAM.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Just wondering

Do you go to PL Dunbar High School?QuizQuick 02:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No I went to Lafayette High School, so you probably don't know me. Just thought it would cool seeing a few Dunbar people on Wikipedia. QuizQuick 16:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File Uploads: Thank you!

Hey, just wanted to thank you for telling me how to upload. If I have any problems I'll contact you like you offered. Thank you! --RattleandHum 8 August 2006

Userbox/es

Please do not restore the redirect. Cross-space redirects are frowned upon per WP:ASR, and this particular one is rather unpopular. The search engine should help you find the intended target page if you set your search preferences to include the Wikipedia: namespace. Thank you. --Kusma (討論) 14:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you couldn't be expected to know this and this evidence of fighting about this page, but you know now :-) Happy editing. --Kusma (討論) 14:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note to myself

here. --Anthony5429 15:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newton

Fine by me, only thing I know is that they (he?) did Streamline. --Oreo Priest 20:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hey

You guessed correctly; I (Carter Adler) attended MSTC @ PLD from 1992-96. --Cmadler 19:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am now! --Cmadler 10:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New userboxes

I have deleted a userbox template you recently created, as userboxes should no longer be created in templatespace per the terms of the German userbox solution. Here is the userbox code so that you can recreate the userbox in your userspace ("userfying") if you wish.

<div style="float:left;border:solid #FF6600 1px;margin:1px;">
<table cellspacing="0" style="width:238px;color:white;background:#FF6600;"><tr>
<td style="width:45px;height:45px;color:#FF6600;background:white;text-align:center;font-size:20pt;"><strong>''B''</strong></td>
<td style="font-size:8pt;padding:4pt;line-height:1.25em;">
<div style="font-family:  verdana; direction: rtl; font-size: tiny;" align="bottom">
<center>This user is a blogger at '''[{{{1|http://blogcube.net}}} {{{2|BlogCube}}}]'''</center></div></td>
</tr></table></div>

--Cyde Weys 15:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Yes, you're allowed to change them, but it'd be good to add a note saying you have done so. --Ch acor 07:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To withdraw just: 1. remove reference to it from the main page (WP:RFA) 2. put {{subst:rfaf}} on top of your specific RFA page. And I guess leave something like "withdrawing" in your edit summaries. It's really a good idea to do, because some people tend to get nasty to people without much experience. Cheers. --Konstable 08:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence against macroevolution

Hi Anthony. I should hasten to say that I'm not a creationist but an agnostic whose beliefs range (depending on my mood) from weak atheism to deism to theistic evolution. I am however, flattered that you thought from my edits that I was a creationist which presumably indicates that I have been abiding by the Wikipedia policies of neutral point of view and the recommendation to try to "write for the enemy" much better than I thought. That said, a few comments about your draft (which others seem to have already started commenting on). First, the article reads much closer to an essay trying to make an argument than as an Encyclopedia article (I have slightly similar issues with Evidence for evolution article but the problem there seems to be much less severe). Second, it isn't clear from the article what definition of "macroevolution" you are using - since this term has many different meanings to different people(some creationists define it is as speciation or above whereas others define it differently) it should be made clear if for example you mean macroevolution as defined in the relevant Wikipedia article or somewhere else. Third, you are going to be very careful about Wikipedia's rule against original research which is particularly relevant because it disallows new synthesies of exisiting notions- this will be particularly relevant since you want to use "secular" sources rather than creationist/intelligent design sources. Fourth, there is a concern about WP:NPOV in general as well as the sections of NPOV on undue weight and pseudoscience which I suggest you read carefully. These will be a particular concern since there is a prevailing consensus among biologists and the associated sciences that macroevolution (by almost any reasonable defintion) occurs and has occured. I'll see if I can do anything to help out. --JoshuaZ 14:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to take a while to get back to you. The last few days have been hectic. First, in regard to your question about citing Wikipedia in Wikipedia- basically one cannot. If however, the claim in the other article is sufficiently well sourced you can simply link to that article. So for example if you have an article on X that says "X is an example of a Y"(and this claim is sourced) and you want to mention this in article Z all you need to do in Z is write "X, an example of Y". It is sometimes useful to also bring over the citation for the claim in to the other article. If you have a more specific example let me know and I'll take a look. Now as to your other comment- if you have found anything that you think is "secular" evidence against macroevolution I would be very interested in seeing it but to be honest it most likely doesn't exist. Evolution as a whole has so many detractors for essentially religious reasons that if there were any really serious flaws they would most likely have come to light by now. --JoshuaZ 03:53, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture needed

Well you have already made one, so i really don't bother. --Ysangkok 18:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - I sent that message before I made the new image - I didn't realize how easy SVG XML is. --Anthony5429 20:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Rule

Hello, I have nominated The Rule for speedy deletion, because it does not provide any assertion of notability. If you believe the band satisfies WP:MUSIC, then please add the tag {{hangon}} to the article, and provide Reliable sources. Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Cheers. --Vectro 18:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me of your posting of the deletion tag. I put this article up about a year ago and had it deleted. The reason was because the band had not yet released an album. Now that they have and are touring with Cyndi Lauper, I assumed they would be WP-worthy. Am I wrong? --Anthony5429 18:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as albums go, the actual requirement is that they have "released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels", or else one of their albums is notable for its awards or sales. As far as the tours go, the national tour can yield notability, but it must be "significant" as "reported in notable and verifiable sources", where "significant" usually means "booking agent" or "national or regional headlining". If you have citations to show either the albums or the tour meet these criteria, please add them to the article. Cheers. --Vectro 20:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. I added a reference for the information as per your suggestion. --Anthony5429 20:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, looks good to me. Cheers. --Vectro 00:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trisha Alexander / Patricia Kay

Anthony, thank you for your speedy help with this article :-) --Roaming27 05:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarf rabbit

Hi! Copying article context is not the right way to fix names; you should use move instead because otherwise all the edit history is lost. If you still think the article should be under Dwarf rabbit, you'll need to get an admin to delete the existing one and then do a move on Dwarf rabbits. --Jamoche

Sorry - will make note of this. --Anthony5429 03:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:ChanceForALifetime.png

Thanks for uploading Image:ChanceForALifetime.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Fixed! --Anthony5429 16:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your gallery

Galleries of images are cool, but you're not allowed to use fair-use images in them; fair use images must be in their proper article. --Sonic3KMaster ^(talk) 22:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aww. That's too bad. Thanks for notifying me though. --Anthony5429 06:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can have the gallery, but the images that have the image at right (copyright logo) on its description page has to be in an article, so the GDFL and Public domain pictures you had are fine. Cool that you have the Rubik's Cube userbox on your user page, I made that box :P --Sonic3KMaster ^(talk) 07:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think I'm going to stick with the image list on my user page for now. Thanks for the Rubik's cube UBX. I solve it in 1:07 - you? --Anthony5429 17:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

45 seconds, when I practiced all the time. I don't solve as often anymore, but I think I'm around a minute still. --Sonic3KMaster ^(talk) 19:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IanThorpe.png

Thanks for uploading Image:IanThorpe.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --An gr 08:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I see the source image has been deleted. I'll look for a free image. --Anthony5429 18:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IanThorpe.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IanThorpe.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. -—Kimchi.sg 09:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PNG vs. JPEG

I noticed that you created a template for suggesting that images be replaced with a PNG equivalent, an excellent idea as far as I'm concerned.

However, you have used it to suggest that photographic (or photolike, e.g. images that contain gradients with smooth transitions) images be replaced with PNG equivalents. Such replacement would result in drastically increased filesize with negligible or no gain in quality at all. Compare:

[1] [2] (note that the PNG version is slated for deletion, so it may or may not be around when you get to checking it out.)

The PNG version of this photographic image is four times larger, yet has no improvements in quality (with the exception of being cropped)! This holds true for any image converted from a lossy format (such as JPEG) to a lossless one (as PNG is), and while photographs both created and displayed in lossless formats such as PNG would undoubtedly be devoid of compression artifacts, they would also be way, way too large.

I ask that you please stop tagging photographic images with the ShouldBePNG tag, and use it exclusively for images which contain primarily pixel and line-art, as well as text. --FrostyBytes 22:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with most of your comment on my discussion page. However, when I made the template, I was also considering the fact that a PNG file can be edited with no loss of quality and does not require a patent license to use (as GIF does - does JPEG??). Also, PNG has the advantage over JPEG and BMP of optional transparency and PNG is better than BMP because it is compressed (losslessly of course). I will, for now, follow your suggestion about using Template:ShouldBePNG, but would you please post your concerns on the Template talk:ShouldBePNG page so others can discuss them as well? Thanks! --Anthony5429 01:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, conversion from other lossless formats to PNG is generally (if not without exception, I'm not 100% sure) a good idea. Wasn't thinking about that for some reason. And yes, I've added a recounting of our discussion so far to the talk page in question. --FrostyBytes 01:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mutliple image problems

Possibly unfree Image:Mizan Zainal Abidin.png

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mizan Zainal Abidin.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Oden 10:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Oden 10:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to:

Image:Patrick Heusinger.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Patrick Heusinger.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 10:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:E-lyrics logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:E-lyrics logo.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Oden 10:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to:

Fair use image in user namespace

Hello! You have used a fair use image in your user namespace (Image:e-lyrics logo.png and Image:e-lyrics.png). Criterion 9 of the Wikipedia:Fair use criteria states that "Fair use images may be used only in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are not covered under the fair use doctrine." I have removed it on these grounds. Sincerely, --Oden 10:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I would actually like to have both deleted if possible. How would I go about doing that? Is there a tag for images which are not linked to and which the author would like deleted? --Anthony5429 14:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image problems

Hello!

After noticing that one of the images you uploaded appeared to be a copyright infringement (Image:Mizan Zainal Abidin.png) I have reviewed your contributions and found several possibly copyrighted images which you have uploaded as GFDL. In one instance you wrote: "I licensed this image as GFDL as per the context of the page I found it on." (here). In order to avoid copyright problems it is important to know the copyright status of every image used on Wikipedia. You can view your upload log here.

Sincerely, --Oden 12:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mess. I will take note of this. --Anthony5429 14:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you do not become discouraged by the problems related to images and copyright, this is a fairly common occurrence for new and sometimes even experienced editors, given the complexity of the rules. Your contributions to the text of any article is always appreciated, as well as any images you have taken yourself or which are available under a free license. If you have any questions feel free to leave a message on my talk page. --Oden 14:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not discouraged. Thanks for your help! --Anthony5429 14:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make sure: any other images which you have uploaded and which I have not mentioned are probably acceptable (make sure you have proper source attribution and a fair use rationale on any fair use image, though). Sincerely, --Oden 14:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Rule article on German Wikipedia

Dear Anthony, I am SysOp from the German language Wikipedia and I am sorry that your article was deleted on our project, well, we have criteria which are a little different from those in the English language version. Thats a pity for some toppics and with that some users but it is the way it is. However, I read what the IP wrote on your de-discussion page and I want you to know that he or she was not writing what most users in the de-project think about not native speaking people. So in the name of (I think the mayority) of de-users I have to apologize for such a behavior. And as you can see, my english is also not perfect. Best regards, --Dr. Shaggeman 17:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anthony, I am not sure wether you have my de-talk-page on your watchlist, so i respond here. For an article about The Rule in de-wp it would be good to have maybe some prices they won or some chart position in the article or anything which is special in an NPOV way. de-, at-, ch-charts would be nice but uk- or us-charts should be enough. The problem is that obviously people in Germany do not know the band (and actually The Rule is a shitty name for searching in google). And also I think after somebody tried to fix your translation of the en-article the content was almost completely wrong (as compared with the en-article). With the translation I can help you, but with the rest of the job I can't. So, this was todays last action, /me needs some sleep, it is gettin late, --Dr. Shaggeman 00:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I am starting a recreation of the artikel at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Anthony5429/The_Rule. If you feel inclined to help. I am trying to translate it from English to German. Thanks! --Anthony5429 23:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look tomorrow. Surely I can help (at least with the translation and maybe with some formating stuff). I was taking a look around on some German webpages but unfortunately I found nothing about the band, so (I think) it will be difficult to prove the relevance for de-wp. But sometime being a sysop helps, or maybe wait a little till they are know here also ;-) -- ShaggeDoc talk 00:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mizan Zainal Abidin.png

I'm flattered by your (unfortunately incorrect) assumption that I speak Malay, but there is no licensing information in the original. It's certainly a PR portrait though and thus almost certainly off limits for Wikipedia. --Jpatokal 11:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh. Well thank you very much for the info! --Anthony5429 01:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ref-list and Reference templates

I was away from my computer for a bit, sorry I didn't respond to your Ref-list and Reference question earlier. We should probably discuss merging them on their respective talk pages, Template talk:Ref-list and Template talk:Reference. --Interiot 10:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I've submitted my vote on both talk pages. --Anthony5429 13:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2007

Image:Singing buckeyes.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Singing buckeyes.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ——Bkell (talk) 05:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. Thank you for the notice.

PNG versus JPEG

Hi. I noticed that you've converted a few images including Image:04 Jan 2003 (12).jpg and Image:04 Jan 2003 (11).jpg to the PNG format instead of the JPEG format. These images have already lost resolution by being in the JPEG format. Putting them into the PNG format doesn't improve the quality; all it does is increase the file size. Could you please explain on my talk page why you have done this? --Remember the dot 05:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my response on your talk page. --Anthony5429 06:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cremaster Cycle Reqscreenshot

I saw your reqscreenshot at Talk:The Cremaster Cycle and took some from the Cremaster 3 DVD (most, depicting the other movies, are taken from the trailer, and a few others are from the Guggenheim portion of the movie). Problem is that the screen shot tag for images specifies one per article. Can we argue that there are 5 movies therefore 5 screen shots are valid? I'll go ahead and upload it and feel free to edit. --Blahm 15:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:KittenCannon.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:KittenCannon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from --BJBot 03:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Good morning (GMT time); I've not seen you about, so I suppose I should introduce myself: hey! Don't hesitate to call upon me at my talk page if you need anything, have any advice for me or just want a chat!

Kind regards,
Anthonycfc ^{[T • C]} 01:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. It is a pleasure to meet you. --Anthony5429 06:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lansdowne Elementary School

Hey. I'm putting up this article you created for deletion due to the fact that it makes no attempt to establish notability. If you disagree, you can remove the tag so long as you expand this article. --Wizardman 01:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's no firm policy in place because schools are such a heated issue. Still, is there a big event that happened in the school's history? Is it recognized for a great finish at a national academics event? The addition of things like that would help it show notability. Right now all it says is that it's a school in Kentucky, so any additions can only help the article. --Wizardman 02:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks. I will try to improve the article if I get the time. --Anthony5429 02:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reflist edits

I can see what the comments on {{reflist}} are about, but some of the edits you have made citing that are completely pointless; for example [3]. I also cannot see much point to converting the hard-code to the template, like this. Whilst use of the template may be encouraged, that doesn't mean the hard-code has to be changed and if you do make those edits it would be much better to use an more appropriate edit summary; that has nothing to do with the options listed after all... --Nilf anion (talk) 08:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my reply on your talk page. --Anthony5429 09:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. Harryboyles 06:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 19:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template refstart

I strongly disagree with the proposed merge. I had a look at the Sourcesstart template you mention. It's far too difficult for new editors to deal with. Refstart is a simple, basic guide to get people going. It works very well to do that, and is on quite a number of user pages. The reason it's not linked from user pages is because its usage is with subst: so there's no further pull on the servers. It's still being field-tested and developed, which is why I haven't given it wider publicity as yet. --Tyrenius 00:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my response on your talk page. --Anthony5429 00:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. I actually think the guidelines need clarifying anyway. Everything in one section under the heading of "Notes and references" is fine, but it doesn't give clear examples when there is one section for "Footnotes" and another for "References". Are you doing any work in this area at all? --Tyrenius 00:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Please see Template talk:Reflist#Instances of ref-small and its current implementation on Template:Refend. --Anthony5429 00:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me

Was there in Winter 2004.. --Delazio

Please see my reply on your talk page. --Anthony5429 05:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, stayed there during Winter. Learned the local culture n lived with local people. I didn't visit any tourist places except Turpan, coz that was not the idea, but rather to really learned their way of living. --Delazio 02:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to do it.. haha --Delazio 18:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply on your talk page... --Anthony5429 18:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional refs for Kirino Natsuo

Please see my query on Kirino discussion page... SGilsdorf 14:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the tag as per your comment. Thanks for making note of that. --Anthony5429 21:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newton (musician)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Newton (musician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Petri Krohn 01:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fair. Thanks. --Anthony5429 21:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PNG → SVG

Hi. It's not so hard to create SVGs from PNGs, but to get a good quality result, ah: there's the rub. PNGs are "scalar" graphics — i.e. they're formed from individual pixels at a certain resolution — while SVGs are "vector" graphics, defined in terms of mathematical lines and curves so that the image will look smooth at any resolution. Essentially PNGs are approximations of an image, and and to convert back to a more precisely defined image involves guesswork as to what was originally intended.

The process is called bitmap tracing, and it's fairly well automated, but it makes guesses about lines (exactly where the lines should be, whether they're straight or curved, etc.) that aren't always quite right. Often you have to do a significant amount of manual clean-up to get it perfect.

The sequence of actions is this. Import a bitmap into your SVG document (File>Import). Select the bitmap. Trace it (Path>Trace Bitmap). A dialog comes up which gives various options. These are different algorithms by which the edge detection is performed. Play with these options and values a bit, hitting the preview button every now and again to see what the result will look like. When you're ready, trace it. Easy. --Fuzzypeg ☻ 21:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll give it a shot! --Anthony5429 21:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was too late to help, though Fuzzy did much better than I would have :) --Dagibit 18:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YEC userbox

Thanks for the comment. I am glad you are a YEC, too, and that you can use my userbox. --Learse 20:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! --Anthony5429 01:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gerpok_user.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gerpok_user.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --The Sunshine Man 17:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll fix that. --Anthony5429 17:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gurgling

I have redirected this article to Gargling as this article already treats the subject. From the dictionary definition, gurgling is actually making the sound associated with bubbling through a liquid and isn't the rinsing act, which is gargling. The article is still a stub if you want to contribute more to it. Thanks! --Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 22:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha - thanks! I never realised there is gurgling and gargling! --Anthony5429 22:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I had to look it up...yay for my vocabulary:-P. --Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 22:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Arcticmonkeyslogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Arcticmonkeyslogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --BetacommandBot 09:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, I uploaded an SVG version to replace that and stated the fair use rationale correctly in the SVG. --Anthony5429 05:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amioun

Thanks Anthony for your last notice about amioun. I will not write a lot, but I just want to say that you’re right about the name. “We”: citizens of amioun do not make a big difference but the name of our city could be found in many forms. In this beloved encyclopedia it is cardinal to maintain one single script, but can I ask you what do you mean by entries? I am relatively new in this domain, thanks in advance. --user:Naseem abi shaheen 17 june 2007

I searched on google for Amioun and Amyun and found 9870 results for the first and only 2600 results for the second. Thanks for your help! I have been to Amioun myself; it is a beautiful village/town. --Anthony5429 05:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PNG -> SVG

Sorry for my late Answer!

first import the PNG file: File -> Import...
select Path -> Trace Bitmap...
the rest should explain itself ;)

-- panzi 18:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I have figured it out; works great! --Anthony5429 05:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Master and commander.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Master and commander.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --BetacommandBot 07:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will take care of this. --Anthony5429 05:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:SnowPatrolLogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:SnowPatrolLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --BetacommandBot 09:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine. I had meant to have that image removed. Thanks! --Anthony5429 06:02, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gerpok_user.png

I have tagged Image:Gerpok_user.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. --Core desat 07:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see it is deleted. That's okay; rationale seems logical. --Anthony5429 05:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LinkOnHorse.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:LinkOnHorse.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --—♦♦ SʘʘTHING^(Я) 05:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll take care of that. --Anthony5429 12:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another note to myself

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29#alpha_channel_for_favicon --Anthony5429 03:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:LinkOnHorse.png

Thanks for uploading Image:LinkOnHorse.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Ejfetters 10:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks; I'll look into it. --Anthony5429 01:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Arcticmonkeyslogo.svg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Arcticmonkeyslogo.svg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. --OsamaKBOT 20:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I'll look into it. --Anthony5429 03:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed; I uploaded information about the source of the image as per the bot's request. --Anthony5429 17:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Arcticmonkeyslogo.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Arcticmonkeyslogo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 05:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ihackedlastfm.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ihackedlastfm.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chris B • talk 16:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 17:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Warren_barfield.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Warren_barfield.png. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 11:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 06:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IAmDavid.png

Thanks for uploading Image:IAmDavid.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 17:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Lumen (band)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lumen (band), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lumen (band) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lumen (band), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --CSDWarnBot 18:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 02:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge templates

The date syntax is: {{Merge|other arguments|date=December 2007}}, but if you leave the date off it will be added by a WP:BOT. --Rich Farmbrough, 19:04 5 December 2007 (GMT).

Thank you. --Anthony5429 (talk) 20:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi; you recently added the {{ShouldBeSVG}} template to numerous PNG graphs. The template accepts a parameter to categorise images into subcategories based on their content; one of these is '|graph'. The base category for raster>SVG conversions is rather full; I for one would appreciate it very much if you could take a look at Template:ShouldBeSVG at the list of available subcategories and use them where possible, to avoid adding further to the bulk of images in Category:Images that should be in SVG format. Thanks! --Stannered (talk) 00:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information! --Anthony5429 17:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating the 'ref' templates

It certainly makes things a lot easier in producing referenced articles, written up to the standard that Wikipedia and its readers deserve. It's always nice to find a Wikipedian looking to create informative and well-written articles, and who is making significant efforts towards that goal.

Thank you very much. --Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 16:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome. I am glad the templates are appreciated. --Anthony5429 (talk) 20:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2008

AfD nomination of Nintendocore

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nintendocore, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendocore. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 03:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 20:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CreationMuseum06.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CreationMuseum06.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 06:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 07:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CreationMuseum11.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CreationMuseum11.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 06:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 07:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CreationMuseum12.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CreationMuseum12.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 06:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 07:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CreationMuseum14.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CreationMuseum14.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 06:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 07:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sweet Land.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Sweet Land.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 18:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheRuleAlbum.png

Thanks for uploading Image:TheRuleAlbum.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks that may confuse readers

I replied on my talk page. --Pixelface (talk) 00:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. --Anthony5429 (talk) 16:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CreationMuseum13.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CreationMuseum13.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 13:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FromWhereYouAre.png

Thanks for uploading Image:FromWhereYouAre.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ChanceForALifetime.png

Thanks for uploading Image:ChanceForALifetime.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 01:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LinkOnHorse.png

Thanks for uploading Image:LinkOnHorse.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 01:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References, Notes and Bibliography

Hi, thanks for taking the trouble to clean up the "references" sections at various articles. However, please acquaint yourself with the various citation styles -- specifically {{harvnb}} -- before you continue. "Notes" "References" and "Bibliography" are not necessarily synonymous and should not be tossed together without careful review. Thanks. --Fullstop (talk) 20:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will review that article. Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:CVU2.png

A tag has been placed on Image:CVU2.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:CVU2.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 05:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is very reasonable now that there is an SVG for it. --Anthony5429 (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Amioun1.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Amioun1.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Amioun1.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 03:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of that. --Anthony5429 (talk) 15:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alaska In Winter

A tag has been placed on Alaska In Winter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 16:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for removing the tag. --Anthony5429 (talk) 20:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CatchpennyLogo.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CatchpennyLogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --Undeath (talk) 05:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 21:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Skybox

I have nominated Skybox, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skybox. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TheLetterM (talk) 19:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Anthony5429 (talk) 08:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license: Unspecified source for Image:Insect eating insect.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Insect eating insect.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. As you will see by accessing the image, I would like the image deleted as I have uploaded Two insects.png instead. --Anthony5429 (talk) 08:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Armoiries Dauphiné Auvergne.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Armoiries Dauphiné Auvergne.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Armoiries Dauphiné Auvergne.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 02:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the uploader of this image. --Anthony5429 (talk) 01:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Ihackedlastfm

Thank you for the notification. --Anthony5429 (talk) 17:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Maristela Tayoko

An article that you have been involved in editing, Maristela Tayoko, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maristela Tayoko. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tosqueira (talk) 23:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification. --Anthony5429 (talk) 17:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Next Limit Technologies

This article has been nomiated for deletion. Please see WP:PROD. Thanks, Boleyn2 (talk) 20:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the notification. --Anthony5429 (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete long comments in short articles

Those who patrol short pages add them to mark that the article has been reviewed and need not be reviewed. If we didn't add the comments, the same articles would continually be on the short pages and we'd miss lots of crap articles and test pages and vandalism that make it through the new changes patrollers. Thanks. --Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I make a lot of edits and am not sure exactly which edit you are referring to. Can you let me know which edit you are referring to? And I will be sure to not make the same mistake again. Thanks! --Anthony5429 (talk) 05:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ice storm pics

I saw your post in the discussion section of Ice Storm asking for more ice storm photos, and have granted your wish. I don't know how to upload them to the main article, so I posted the websites of those pics in the discussion section.Darthvader1 (talk) 01:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2009

Save Bruce Simpson

Wikipedia article Bruce Simpson has been nominated for deletion by Tercero. Maybe Bruce has some funny views sometimes and rubs some folk up the wrong way, but his achievements are significant and he is certainly suficiently notable for an article in wikipedia. Since you have edited this article, you might care to post a comment in support of retaining it here. Thanks --Pakaraki (talk) 07:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is rather amusing as I had made a couple very minor edits to the article. Anyway, it looks like your wish was granted. /grats. --Anthony5429 (talk) 20:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abbottabad Thumb.png

Next time you decide to tag an image for something like it being inappropriately uploaded under a format, please make sure it isn't a commons image. The Wikimedia Commons is hosting this image, not Wikipedia, so its better to be tagged on that project than this one because new versions of the image will uploaded there. — Moe --ε 21:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip! --Anthony5429 (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"general" and "specific" reference in documentation of template:reflist

Hi. Your documentation of {{reflist}} discusses "general" and "specific" references. Did you just.. sorta use this terminology.. because it was a convenient way to express your thoughts and intent? In other words, did you see this terminology before using it, or did you just sorta arrive at it via the need for a convenient term (in essence, did you make it up yourself)? Thanks Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 11:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oops! Disregard all that! Ligulem added that phrasing. I will go bother Ligulem; sorry to have bothered you. Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 11:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I do believe I began using that terminology. And I did it because "it was a convenient way to express [my] thoughts and intent." Is that alright? --Anthony5429 (talk) 18:11, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Making notes, reference, further reading, and external links small?

Looking at the style guide, and and at the documentation for the templates relevant for the "standard appendices" after "see also", it strikes me that, although all of these appendices should be "small", if any of them are, that there's only template support for making "notes" and "references" small. Is there an agreed to approach to making "further reading" and "external links" small also? The obvious way to proceed is to use {{refbegin}} and {{refend}}. Is that the way to go? Are there {{notesbegin}} or {{furtherbegin}} templates that I've missed? Thanks for any guidance! — Aldaron • T/C 19:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what I mean, if that wasn't clear. — Aldaron • T/C 20:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know of any other templates like that, but you are certainly welcome to start your own template for that purpose and see what others feel about it. Cheers! --Anthony5429 (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Therulelogo.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Therulelogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 16:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. --Anthony5429 (talk) 19:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2010

Articles for deletion nomination of Next Limit Technologies

I have nominated Next Limit Technologies, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Limit Technologies (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. St Anselm (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi; thanks for the notification. --Anthony5429 (talk) 19:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Tiptoety ^talk 06:39, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! --Anthony5429 (talk) 12:44, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2011

Nomination for deletion of Template:Refimprove

Template:Refimprove has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:06, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. I never got around to making a comment in that discussion, but am glad to see that the consensus was to keep the template. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 04:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fairview Elementary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fairview Elementary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairview Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. I never got around to making a comment in that discussion, but am glad to see that the consensus was to keep. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 16:32, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2012

Nomination for deletion of Template:Screenshot requested

Template:Screenshot requested has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 14:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign office hostage crisis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hillary Clinton presidential campaign office hostage crisis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillary Clinton presidential campaign office hostage crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 20:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 14:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of speech = New WikiProject

WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech

Hi there, I'm notifying you as I saw your userspace links to {{User free speech}}. I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 23:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks! --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 02:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2013

Nomination of The Rule for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Rule is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rule (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:CM Logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:CM Logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:CM Logo.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:CM Logo.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:CM Logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:CM Logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:CM Logo.png

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:CM Logo.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2014

File:Jefflove.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jefflove.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 10:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2015

Nomination of Prefetch buffer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prefetch buffer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prefetch buffer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 10:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wain McFarlane

The article Wain McFarlane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Questionably notable even for minimal general notability as my searches found nothing better than several passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 05:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 10:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2016

Speedy deletion nomination of Anya von Bremzen

Hello Karam.Anthony.K,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Anya von Bremzen for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ziyankhan1 (talk) 11:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 10:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jason Motlagh

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Karam.Anthony.K, thanks for creating Jason Motlagh!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. INsufficient sources to assert notability. If he is a winner of NOTABLE prizes, this should be mentioned and crrectly sourced. In its prsent cast, the aarticle wil probably be shrtly deleted

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 11:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bathsheba Ratzkoff

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bathsheba Ratzkoff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toddst1 (talk) 23:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 03:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Karam.Anthony.K. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 14:01, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2017

Proposed deletion of Shawa

The article Shawa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NGEO or WP:GNG. The article also has no sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtlasDuane (talk) 11:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 14:01, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Karam.Anthony.K. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2018

Nomination for deletion of Template:More citations needed

Template:More citations needed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. KMF (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Krondi

Hello Karam.Anthony.K,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Krondi for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Jbh ^Talk 05:50, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also no evidence of notability and sourced only to itself Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Krondi screen capture 2017-09-03.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Krondi screen capture 2017-09-03.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ryan Liestman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Karam.Anthony.K. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2019

Proposed deletion of Qjackctl

The article Qjackctl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2020

Speedy deletion nomination of 2020 Kentucky Derby

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2020 Kentucky Derby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.livetv-channel.com/what-channel-is-kentucky-derby-2019. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 03:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm; this is interesting because I started the 2020 Kentucky Derby article by simply copying and adjusting the text of the 2019 Kentucky Derby article... --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've tried recreating it again, this time with many changes/deletions from the baseline text of the 2019 article. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 21:09, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2021

Nomination for merger of Template:More citations needed section

Template:More citations needed section has been nominated for merging with Template:More citations needed. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChanceForALifetime.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChanceForALifetime.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got it; thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2022

Nomination for merger of Template:More citations needed

Template:More citations needed has been nominated for merging with Template:BLP sources. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 21:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk of 2023

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 20:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]