Talk:Chislehurst
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Photo
[edit]The photo is poor and is of the cave attraction rather than something that signifies Chislehurst itself. However it's better than nothing, I hope. Secretlondon 13:03, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Spelling
[edit]Where does the spellins of chiselherste come from? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alec - U.K. (talk • contribs) .
- I don't know where your spellins (sic) comes from, but the traditional spelling is a modern version of what you will find in the second sentence of the article. Kevin McE 16:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chislehurst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090820050141/http://www.chislehurstbaptistchurch.com/Chislehurst_Baptist_Church/home.html to http://www.chislehurstbaptistchurch.com/Chislehurst_Baptist_Church/home.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070603070042/http://www.chislehurstmethodistcircuit.co.uk/circle_1.htm to http://www.chislehurstmethodistcircuit.co.uk/circle_1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Restructure 1 June 2021
[edit]Following some pretty nasty comments in the edit summary, and to be clear I am considering requests at ANI/DELREV/RPP, I have restructured to achieve broad WP:UKTOWNS compliance, which is usually the best way to go in the event of disputes.. The result is not perfect but is the right way forward and the article can gradually be reworked towards that structure. It is likely Culture and community and Landmarks sections will eventually take some of the content currently in the Geography and history sections in time. The Toponymy header may be dropped in time depending on how the history section evolves. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC) Actually I have created a Landmarks section and moved the cases and Camden place there as it helped reduced awwardness. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Start-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- Start-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- Start-Class London-related articles
- Mid-importance London-related articles
- Start-Class UK geography articles
- Mid-importance UK geography articles