Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St ham's day
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 07:00, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
A vanity holiday created by students at a particular grammar school and only celebrated there. See WP:VAIN. Meelar (talk) 19:19, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
I have personally heard reports of this holiday being celebrated at other secondary schools in the area, and it is a genuine 'cult'. (unsigned comment made by "80.43.94.161", the article's author)
- Speedy delete Hoax/fiction. Zero Google hits. --Xcali 19:29, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Burn with fire, like you would anything heretical. ;) --Scimitar 20:03, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Damn. THE WORD OF ST HAM WILL BE SPREAD! Speedy delete.
- Delete - incitement to violence arguably illegal. Not funny enough to be excused as satire. Hell with it, it's just lame. AlexTiefling 20:12, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Just leave it up, ferchrissakes. At least until I get the webpage working...
- Sorry. Wikipedia is not a hosting service. Meelar (talk) 20:20, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a hosting service. --Idont Havaname 20:22, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, what webpage?
- Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Martg76 22:15, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please delete it! Jamie Graham is threatening a lawsuit! I'm begging you!
- Speedy delete as utter dreck and waste. 216.158.31.195 14:29, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nonsense. JamesBurns 09:56, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.