Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gasermatiladme

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:13, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gasermatiladme

Not certain about suggesting deletion of this one, and hopefully someone will be able to fill in more details, but the three key words in this rarticle (Gasermatiladme, Seriladmen, and Nakabuderamis) each return zero hits on google other than in copies of this article. Neither are any of them listed in my ancient Encyclopaedia Britannica. But it doesn't really smell hoax to me. Anyone here know enough of the ancient history of (where? Central Asia?) to say for sure? Grutness|^hello? 01:43, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From this point, I'm adding Shulaiapith V to this VfD. It's the only inbound to Gasermatiladme, and is itself an orphan. Like Gasermatiladme, only hits are Wikipedia mirrors. Samaritan 01:58, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both as unverifiable unless referenced. Samaritan 01:58, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unverifiable. Megan1967 05:05, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, couldn't find it in some academic sources either, almost certainly phoney. --Zero 12:20, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- bears no resemblance to history. Suspect seed for further spam/vandalism. --Simon Cursitor 13:49, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unverifiable. Certainly a hoax because any capital of a kingdom would definitely get alot of hits. And this "king" doesn't get any hits either except wiki mirrors.
Delete. Unverifiable. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:54, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It would certainly be one of the more odd hoaxes we've seen, however as it is completely unverifiable, nuke it is. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 01:41, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.