Talk:Intraplate earthquake

Earthquakes Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Intraplate earthquake is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Intraplate earthquake

I've started to add some of my earthquake contributions Zeizmic

This is junk science. How do we get rid of it? The author has no idea what plate tectonics is. (I can't wait for the discussion of dinner plate tectonics vs. salad plate tectonics). The citation of intraplate earthquakes is just an incorrect mapping. Next this author will be discussing the Pacific "ring of fire." CITE YOUR SOURCES (other than the scholars of Bob Jones U.) Rich J 02:10 5 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Um, not to be too much of a nitpick...

...but how is it possible that an earthquake in Mardid in 1812 registered on the Richter scale? (Assuming that this is the measurement given on the page...)? The Richter scale wasn't even invented until 1935, at least, according to wikipedia.org.

Thanks!

- Sammy —Preceding unsigned comment added by SammyJames (talk • contribs) 02:57, 24 October 2006

The Richter scale bit was an after the fact estimate based on damage and effects.

I've added some external links (from a quick Google search) for use as references for a much needed rewrite of this somewhat rambling essay. Vsmith 11:22, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--- Um, first of all MOST earthquakes that occur are at fault lines (which is the name giving to plate boundaries, and is completely contradicted in this article). Most earthquakes ARE NOT intraplate earthquakes - in fact, they are relatively few and far between. Someone who knows something about plate techtonics really needs to rewrite this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.253.138.90 (talk) 20:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverie, TN

Is it necessary to prominently include Reverie, TN (population 11) in an article about intraplate earthquakes (as a global phenomenon)? Geogene (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Globalizing the Article

I think more information should be included on the India earthquake, there was an intraplate quake in Australia back in the 1980s, and there are some intraplate seismic zone in Brazil. However, globalize because of North America's history with intraplate earthquakes--namely there have been a lot of them, and two (New Madrid series and Charleston) were big. Also, New Madrid gets a lot of play in the up. It tends to be the one global intraplate quakes are compared to. I edited today to play down obvious North American bias and removed the tag. Geogene (talk) 02:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hotspots

I assume intraplate earthquakes doesn't include earthquakes connected with hotspots (like Hawaii), which are, technically, intraplate. Am I right or am I wrong?

97.113.77.20 (talk) 17:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Growing/Expanding Earth

Expanding Earth... expansion along mid-ocean ridges... continents spread further apart... continents flatten... intra-plate earthquake! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.162.74.172 (talk) 06:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Intraplate earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327065704/http://www.ucm.es/BUCM/revistas/fis/02144557/articulos/FITE9898110167A.PDF to http://www.ucm.es/BUCM/revistas/fis/02144557/articulos/FITE9898110167A.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]