Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Tebelius
Diane Tebelius was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 7 votes to delete, 2 votes to keep. Postdlf 22:37, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Failed political candidate's misplaced vanity page. MeltBanana 08:20, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Not sure about vanity, but anyway, she lost a primary, so wasn't even her party's choice to run for Congress, let alone a Congressperson. Delete. — Bill 12:25, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Conservative candidates for congress are notable, gets fair amount of hits as well. Wyllium 14:51, 2004 Oct 21 (UTC)
- Delete: she lost the primary. Beyond that, there's nothing to write. -- [[User:Bobdoe|BobDoe]] 16:21, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- She lost the primary, and doesn't seem notable for any other reasons (e.g., I would accept previously holding office as a Secretary of State or something). Delete.. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:34, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Didn't get to be the candidate for congress, as she lost the primary. Needs more than this to establish note. Average Earthman 18:03, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. I'd vote to keep if there was anything at all remotely notable mentioned about her besides "failed primary candidate". Gamaliel 20:34, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Del; office-seekers are non-notable w/o something more, like major-party endoresement for their nomination or a hell of an impressive campaign organization. --Jerzy(t) 01:41, 2004 Oct 26 (UTC)
- Keep - a real candidate. Intrigue 22:35, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.