User talk:Hyperdivision

Padovan sequence

Hyperdivision - hello, and welcome to Wikpedia ! Just to let you know that I have restored the initial values given in Padovan sequence to 1,1,1 because this is what Ian Stewart and Mathworld use, and because identities in the rest of the article are consistent with these initial values. If the sequence were to start with 1,0,0 then a lot of the identities and properties in the rest of the article would also have to be adjusted. However, I have also added a note to the intro. explaining that different sources may use different starting points. Gandalf61 09:17, July 31, 2005 (UTC)

Coreworld

Thank-you for writing about the Quantum Coreworld. I'm the author and I plan to make many new updates soon. Please stay in touch. --ASW 22:17, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PQmars

PQmars has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with First Look (Second Life Viewer)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, First Look (Second Life Viewer), we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://secondlife.com/community/firstlook.php. As a copyright violation, First Look (Second Life Viewer) appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. First Look (Second Life Viewer) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:First Look (Second Life Viewer). If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at First Look (Second Life Viewer), after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Pak21 08:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Guile-title.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Guile-title.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 01:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qcw2-gnu-400.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Qcw2-gnu-400.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alien msh face.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alien msh face.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quantum virtual machine

The article Quantum virtual machine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's no indication of any significance of this topic. The stub is little more than a definition, and such articles are not appropriate to Wikipedia, WP:DICDEF. It appears to be entirely original work, WP:OR; although it has references, the references appear to be drawn to the general topics of quantum computing or quantum programming, and not to the subject of the article. It's nearly orphaned (other than merge proposals, and one link from unnotable Libquantum) and appears to be just a placeholder for links; to other articles and to external URLs. I came here to follow up on the three-year-old merge proposal, but there's nothing to merge here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Libquantum

The article Libquantum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable software library

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charlotte and a Penguin.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charlotte and a Penguin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coreworld fig1.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coreworld fig1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coreworld fig2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coreworld fig2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Aloha robot.png

The file File:Aloha robot.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, created by uploader for their userpage. Not enough context to determine future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 02:33, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tiptoe girl.png

The file File:Tiptoe girl.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, created by uploader for their userpage. Not enough context to determine future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 02:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]